BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

C. L. Ellison

C. L. Ellison contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.comp-phmath.NAmath-phmath.MPphysics.flu-dynphysics.plasm-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - Baseline
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Cross-Code verification and sensitivity analysis to effectively model the electrothermal instability

This manuscript presents verification cases that are developed to study the electrothermal instability (ETI). Specific verification cases are included to ensure that the unit physics components necessary to model the ETI are accurate, providing a path for fluid-based codes to effectively simulate ETI in the linear and nonlinear growth regimes. Two software frameworks with different algorithmic approaches are compared for accuracy in their ability to simulate diffusion of a magnetic field, linear growth of the ETI, and a fully nonlinear ETI evolution. The nonlinear ETI simulations show early time agreement, with some differences emerging, as noted in the wavenumber spectrum, late into the nonlinear development of ETI. A sensitivity study explores the role of equation-of-state (EOS), vacuum density, and vacuum resistivity. EOS and vacuum resistivity are found to be the most critical factors in the modeling of nonlinear ETI development.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Comment on "Symplectic integration of magnetic systems": a proof that the Boris algorithm is not variational

The Boris algorithm for integrating charged particle trajectories in electric and magnetic fields is popular due to its simple implementation, rapid iteration, and observed long-term numerical fidelity. The underlying cause of this long-term fidelity has become a matter of controversy, with one article claiming the method to be symplectic [S. D. Webb, J. Comput. Phys. 270 (2014) 570], and others claiming the method to be volume preserving but not symplectic [e.g. H. Qin et al., Phys. Plasmas 20 (2013) 084503]. To resolve the discrepancy, this letter leverages a discrete Helmholtz condition to demonstrate that no variational formulation of the Boris algorithm exists, indicating that the long-term fidelity should be attributed to the volume-preserving properties of the algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Initializing and stabilizing variational multistep algorithms for modeling dynamical systems

Backward error initialization and parasitic mode control are well-suited for use in algorithms that arise from a discrete variational principle on phase-space dynamics. Dynamical systems described by degenerate Lagrangians, such as those occurring in phase-space action principles, lead to variational multistep algorithms for the integration of first-order differential equations. As multistep algorithms, an initialization procedure must be chosen and the stability of parasitic modes assessed. The conventional selection of initial conditions using accurate one-step methods does not yield the best numerical performance for smoothness and stability. Instead, backward error initialization identifies a set of initial conditions that minimize the amplitude of undesirable parasitic modes. This issue is especially important in the context of structure-preserving multistep algorithms where numerical damping of the parasitic modes would violate the conservation properties. In the presence of growing parasitic modes, the algorithm may also be periodically re-initialized to prevent the undesired mode from reaching large amplitude. Numerical examples of variational multistep algorithms are presented in which the backward error initialized trajectories outperform those initialized using highly accurate approximations of the true solution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Variational integrators for perturbed non-canonical Hamiltonian systems

Finite-dimensional non-canonical Hamiltonian systems arise naturally from Hamilton's principle in phase space. We present a method for deriving variational integrators that can be applied to perturbed non-canonical Hamiltonian systems on manifolds based on discretizing this phase-space variational principle. Relative to the perturbation parameter $ε$, this type of integrator can take $O(1)$ time steps with arbitrary accuracy in $ε$ by leveraging the unperturbed dynamics. Moreover, these integrators are coordinate independent in the sense that their time-advance rules transform correctly when passing from one phase space coordinate system to another.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access