Source author record

C. D. Leonard

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

gr-qc hep-th astro-ph.CO

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2021arXiv

DES Y1 results: Splitting growth and geometry to test $Λ$ CDM

We analyze Dark Energy Survey (DES) data to constrain a cosmological model where a subset of parameters -- focusing on $Ω_m$ -- are split into versions associated with structure growth (e.g. $Ω_m^{\rm grow}$ ) and expansion history (e.g. $Ω_m^{\rm geo}$ ). Once the parameters have been specified for the $Λ$ CDM cosmological model, which includes general relativity as a theory of gravity, it uniquely predicts the evolution of both geometry (distances) and the growth of structure over cosmic time. Any inconsistency between measurements of geometry and growth could therefore indicate a breakdown of that model. Our growth-geometry split approach therefore serves as both a (largely) model-independent test for beyond- $Λ$ CDM physics, and as a means to characterize how DES observables provide cosmological information. We analyze the same multi-probe DES data as arXiv:1811.02375 : DES Year 1 (Y1) galaxy clustering and weak lensing, which are sensitive to both growth and geometry, as well as Y1 BAO and Y3 supernovae, which probe geometry. We additionally include external geometric information from BOSS DR12 BAO and a compressed Planck 2015 likelihood, and external growth information from BOSS DR12 RSD. We find no significant disagreement with $Ω_m^{\rm grow}=Ω_m^{\rm geo}$ . When DES and external data are analyzed separately, degeneracies with neutrino mass and intrinsic alignments limit our ability to measure $Ω_m^{\rm grow}$ , but combining DES with external data allows us to constrain both growth and geometric quantities. We also consider a parameterization where we split both $Ω_m$ and $w$ , but find that even our most constraining data combination is unable to separately constrain $Ω_m^{\rm grow}$ and $w^{\rm grow}$ . Relative to $Λ$ CDM, splitting growth and geometry weakens bounds on $σ_8$ but does not alter constraints on $h$ .

preprint2014arXiv

Critical Collapse in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity in Five and Six Dimensions

Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity (EGB) provides a natural higher dimensional and higher order curvature generalization of Einstein gravity. It contains a new, presumably microscopic, length scale that should affect short distance properties of the dynamics, such as Choptuik scaling. We present the results of a numerical analysis in generalized flat slice co-ordinates of self-gravitating massless scalar spherical collapse in five and six dimensional EGB gravity near the threshold of black hole formation. Remarkably, the behaviour is universal (i.e. independent of initial data) but qualitatively different in five and six dimensions. In five dimensions there is a minimum horizon radius, suggestive of a first order transition between black hole and dispersive initial data. In six dimensions no radius gap is evident. Instead, below the GB scale there is a change in the critical exponent and echoing period.

preprint2011arXiv

Hamiltonian Formulation of Scalar Field Collapse in Einstein Gauss Bonnet Gravity

We compute the Hamiltonian for spherically symmetric scalar field collapse in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity in D dimensions using slicings that are regular across future horizons. We first reduce the Lagrangian to two dimensions using spherical symmetry. We then show that choosing the spatial coordinate to be a function of the areal radius leads to a relatively simple Hamiltonian constraint whose gravitational part is the gradient of the generalized mass function. Next we complete the gauge fixing such that the metric is the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet generalization of non-static Painleve-Gullstrand coordinates. Finally, we derive the resultant reduced equations of motion for the scalar field. These equations are suitable for use in numerical simulations of spherically symmetric scalar field collapse in Gauss-Bonnet gravity and can readily be generalized to other matter fields minimally coupled to gravity.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

C. D. Leonard

Research overview

Is this your work?

3 publications

DES Y1 results: Splitting growth and geometry to test $Λ$ CDM

Critical Collapse in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity in Five and Six Dimensions

Hamiltonian Formulation of Scalar Field Collapse in Einstein Gauss Bonnet Gravity

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

C. D. Leonard

Research overview

Is this your work?

3 publications

DES Y1 results: Splitting growth and geometry to test ΛΛΛCDM

Critical Collapse in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity in Five and Six Dimensions

Hamiltonian Formulation of Scalar Field Collapse in Einstein Gauss Bonnet Gravity

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

DES Y1 results: Splitting growth and geometry to test $Λ$ CDM