Researcher profile

C. Brook

C. Brook contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

The mass of our Galaxy from satellite proper motions in the Gaia era

We use Gaia DR2 systemic proper motions of 45 satellite galaxies to constrain the mass of the Milky Way using the scale free mass estimator of Watkins et al. (2010). We first determine the anisotropy parameter $β$, and the tracer satellites' radial density index $γ$ to be $β$=$-0.67^{+0.45}_{-0.62}$ and $γ=2.11\pm0.23$. When we exclude possible former satellites of the Large Magellanic Cloud, the anisotropy changes to $β$=$-0.21^{+0.37}_{-0.51}$. We find that the index of the Milky Way's gravitational potential $α$, which is dependent on the mass itself, is the parameter with the largest impact on the mass determination. Via comparison with cosmological simulations of Milky Way-like galaxies, we carried out a detailed analysis of the estimation of the observational uncertainties and their impact on the mass estimator. We found that the mass estimator is biased when applied naively to the satellites of simulated Milky Way halos. Correcting for this bias, we obtain for our Galaxy a mass of $0.58^{+0.15}_{-0.14}\times10^{12}$M$_\odot$ within 64 kpc, as computed from the inner half of our observational sample, and $1.43^{+0.35}_{-0.32}\times10^{12}$M$_\odot$ within 273 kpc, from the full sample; this latter value extrapolates to a virial mass of $M_\mathrm{vir\,Δ=97}$=$1.51^{+0.45}_{-0.40} \times 10^{12}M_{\odot}$ corresponding to a virial radius of R$_\mathrm{vir}$=$308\pm29$ kpc. This value of the Milky Way mass lies in-between other mass estimates reported in the literature, from various different methods.