BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Bryan E. Shepherd

Bryan E. Shepherd contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyApplicationsComputation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Addressing Detection Limits with Semiparametric Cumulative Probability Models

Detection limits (DLs), where a variable is unable to be measured outside of a certain range, are common in research. Most approaches to handle DLs in the response variable implicitly make parametric assumptions on the distribution of data outside DLs. We propose a new approach to deal with DLs based on a widely used ordinal regression model, the cumulative probability model (CPM). The CPM is a type of semiparametric linear transformation model. CPMs are rank-based and can handle mixed distributions of continuous and discrete outcome variables. These features are key for analyzing data with DLs because while observations inside DLs are typically continuous, those outside DLs are censored and generally put into discrete categories. With a single lower DL, the CPM assigns values below the DL as having the lowest rank. When there are multiple DLs, the CPM likelihood can be modified to appropriately distribute probability mass. We demonstrate the use of CPMs with simulations and two HIV data examples. The first example models a biomarker in which 15% of observations are below a DL. The second uses multi-cohort data to model viral load, where approximately 55% of observations are outside DLs which vary across sites and over time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Analyzing Clustered Continuous Response Variables with Ordinal Regression Models

Continuous response variables often need to be transformed to meet regression modeling assumptions; however, finding the optimal transformation is challenging and results may vary with the choice of transformation. When a continuous response variable is measured repeatedly for a subject or the continuous responses arise from clusters, it is more challenging to model the continuous response data due to correlation within clusters. We extend a widely used ordinal regression model, the cumulative probability model (CPM), to fit clustered continuous response variables based on generalized estimating equation (GEE) methods for ordinal responses. With our approach, estimates of marginal parameters, cumulative distribution functions (CDFs), expectations, and quantiles conditional on covariates can be obtained without pre-transformation of the potentially skewed continuous response data. Computational challenges arise with large numbers of distinct values of the continuous response variable, and we propose two feasible and computationally efficient approaches to fit CPMs for clustered continuous response variables with different working correlation structures. We study finite sample operating characteristics of the estimators via simulation, and illustrate their implementation with two data examples. One studies predictors of CD4:CD8 ratios in an HIV study. The other uses data from The Lung Health Study to investigate the contribution of a single nucleotide polymorphism to lung function decline.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Bayesian Cumulative Probability Models for Continuous and Mixed Outcomes

Ordinal cumulative probability models (CPMs) -- also known as cumulative link models -- such as the proportional odds regression model are typically used for discrete ordered outcomes, but can accommodate both continuous and mixed discrete/continuous outcomes since these are also ordered. Recent papers describe ordinal CPMs in this setting using non-parametric maximum likelihood estimation. We formulate a Bayesian CPM for continuous or mixed outcome data. Bayesian CPMs inherit many of the benefits of frequentist CPMs and have advantages with regard to interpretation, flexibility, and exact inference (within simulation error) for parameters and functions of parameters. We explore characteristics of the Bayesian CPM through simulations and a case study using HIV biomarker data. In addition, we provide the package 'bayesCPM' which implements Bayesian CPM models using the R interface to the Stan probabilistic programing language. The Bayesian CPM for continuous outcomes can be implemented with only minor modifications to the prior specification and, despite some limitations, has generally good statistical performance with moderate or large sample sizes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Fitting Semiparametric Cumulative Probability Models for Big Data

Cumulative probability models (CPMs) are a robust alternative to linear models for continuous outcomes. However, they are not feasible for very large datasets due to elevated running time and memory usage, which depend on the sample size, the number of predictors, and the number of distinct outcomes. We describe three approaches to address this problem. In the divide-and-combine approach, we divide the data into subsets, fit a CPM to each subset, and then aggregate the information. In the binning and rounding approaches, the outcome variable is redefined to have a greatly reduced number of distinct values. We consider rounding to a decimal place and rounding to significant digits, both with a refinement step to help achieve the desired number of distinct outcomes. We show with simulations that these approaches perform well and their parameter estimates are consistent. We investigate how running time and peak memory usage are influenced by the sample size, the number of distinct outcomes, and the number of predictors. As an illustration, we apply the approaches to a large publicly available dataset investigating matrix multiplication runtime with nearly one million observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Three-phase generalized raking and multiple imputation estimators to address error-prone data

Validation studies are often used to obtain more reliable information in settings with error-prone data. Validated data on a subsample of subjects can be used together with error-prone data on all subjects to improve estimation. In practice, more than one round of data validation may be required, and direct application of standard approaches for combining validation data into analyses may lead to inefficient estimators since the information available from intermediate validation steps is only partially considered or even completely ignored. In this paper, we present two novel extensions of multiple imputation and generalized raking estimators that make full use of all available data. We show through simulations that incorporating information from intermediate steps can lead to substantial gains in efficiency. This work is motivated by and illustrated in a study of contraceptive effectiveness among 82,957 women living with HIV whose data were originally extracted from electronic medical records, of whom 4855 had their charts reviewed, and a subsequent 1203 also had a telephone interview to validate key study variables.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improved Generalized Raking Estimators to Address Dependent Covariate and Failure-Time Outcome Error

Biomedical studies that use electronic health records (EHR) data for inference are often subject to bias due to measurement error. The measurement error present in EHR data is typically complex, consisting of errors of unknown functional form in covariates and the outcome, which can be dependent. To address the bias resulting from such errors, generalized raking has recently been proposed as a robust method that yields consistent estimates without the need to model the error structure. We provide rationale for why these previously proposed raking estimators can be expected to be inefficient in failure-time outcome settings involving misclassification of the event indicator. We propose raking estimators that utilize multiple imputation, to impute either the target variables or auxiliary variables, to improve the efficiency. We also consider outcome-dependent sampling designs and investigate their impact on the efficiency of the raking estimators, either with or without multiple imputation. We present an extensive numerical study to examine the performance of the proposed estimators across various measurement error settings. We then apply the proposed methods to our motivating setting, in which we seek to analyze HIV outcomes in an observational cohort with electronic health records data from the Vanderbilt Comprehensive Care Clinic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Raking and Regression Calibration: Methods to Address Bias from Correlated Covariate and Time-to-Event Error

Medical studies that depend on electronic health records (EHR) data are often subject to measurement error, as the data are not collected to support research questions under study. These data errors, if not accounted for in study analyses, can obscure or cause spurious associations between patient exposures and disease risk. Methodology to address covariate measurement error has been well developed; however, time-to-event error has also been shown to cause significant bias but methods to address it are relatively underdeveloped. More generally, it is possible to observe errors in both the covariate and the time-to-event outcome that are correlated. We propose regression calibration (RC) estimators to simultaneously address correlated error in the covariates and the censored event time. Although RC can perform well in many settings with covariate measurement error, it is biased for nonlinear regression models, such as the Cox model. Thus, we additionally propose raking estimators which are consistent estimators of the parameter defined by the population estimating equation. Raking can improve upon RC in certain settings with failure-time data, require no explicit modeling of the error structure, and can be utilized under outcome-dependent sampling designs. We discuss features of the underlying estimation problem that affect the degree of improvement the raking estimator has over the RC approach. Detailed simulation studies are presented to examine the performance of the proposed estimators under varying levels of signal, error, and censoring. The methodology is illustrated on observational EHR data on HIV outcomes from the Vanderbilt Comprehensive Care Clinic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Two-phase analysis and study design for survival models with error-prone exposures

Increasingly, medical research is dependent on data collected for non-research purposes, such as electronic health records data (EHR). EHR data and other large databases can be prone to measurement error in key exposures, and unadjusted analyses of error-prone data can bias study results. Validating a subset of records is a cost-effective way of gaining information on the error structure, which in turn can be used to adjust analyses for this error and improve inference. We extend the mean score method for the two-phase analysis of discrete-time survival models, which uses the unvalidated covariates as auxiliary variables that act as surrogates for the unobserved true exposures. This method relies on a two-phase sampling design and an estimation approach that preserves the consistency of complete case regression parameter estimates in the validated subset, with increased precision leveraged from the auxiliary data. Furthermore, we develop optimal sampling strategies which minimize the variance of the mean score estimator for a target exposure under a fixed cost constraint. We consider the setting where an internal pilot is necessary for the optimal design so that the phase two sample is split into a pilot and an adaptive optimal sample. Through simulations and data example, we evaluate efficiency gains of the mean score estimator using the derived optimal validation design compared to balanced and simple random sampling for the phase two sample. We also empirically explore efficiency gains that the proposed discrete optimal design can provide for the Cox proportional hazards model in the setting of a continuous-time survival outcome.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access