BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Bruno Durand contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
In this paper we use fixed point tilings to answer a question posed by Michael Hochman and show that every one-dimensional effectively closed subshift can be implemented by a local rule in two dimensions. The proof uses the fixed-point construction of an aperiodic tile set and its extensions.
An aperiodic tile set was first constructed by R.Berger while proving the undecidability of the domino problem. It turned out that aperiodic tile sets appear in many topics ranging from logic (the Entscheidungsproblem) to physics (quasicrystals) We present a new construction of an aperiodic tile set that is based on Kleene's fixed-point construction instead of geometric arguments. This construction is similar to J. von Neumann self-reproducing automata; similar ideas were also used by P. Gacs in the context of error-correcting computations. The flexibility of this construction allows us to construct a "robust" aperiodic tile set that does not have periodic (or close to periodic) tilings even if we allow some (sparse enough) tiling errors. This property was not known for any of the existing aperiodic tile sets.
We propose a new simple construction of an aperiodic tile set based on self-referential (fixed point) argument. People often say about some discovery that it appeared "ahead of time", meaning that it could be fully understood only in the context of ideas developed later. For the topic of this note, the construction of an aperiodic tile set based on the fixed-point (self-referential) approach, the situation is exactly the opposite. It should have been found in 1960s when the question about aperiodic tile sets was first asked: all the tools were quite standard and widely used at that time. However, the history had chosen a different path and many nice geometric ad hoc constructions were developed instead (by Berger, Robinson, Penrose, Ammann and many others. In this note we try to correct this error and present a construction that should have been discovered first but seemed to be unnoticed for more that forty years.