Direct comparison of sterile neutrino constraints from cosmological data, disappearance data and appearance data in a model
We present a quantitative, direct comparison of constraints on sterile neutrinos derived from neutrino oscillation experiments and from Planck data, interpreted assuming standard cosmological evolution. We extend a model, which is used to compare exclusions contours at the 95% CL derived from Planck data to those from -disappearance measurements, to a model. This allows us to compare the Planck constraints with those obtained through appearance searches, which are sensitive to more than one active-sterile mixing angle. We find that the cosmological data fully exclude the allowed regions published by the LSND, MiniBooNE and Neutrino-4 collaborations, and those from the gallium and rector anomalies, at the 95% CL. Compared to the exclusion regions from the Daya Bay -disappearance search, the Planck data are more strongly excluding above and , with the Daya Bay exclusion being stronger below these values. Compared to the combined Daya Bay/Bugey/MINOS exclusion region on appearance, the Planck data is more strongly excluding above , with the exclusion strengths of the Planck data and the Daya Bay/Bugey/MINOS combination becoming comparable below this value.