Source author record

Brian Moths

Brian Moths appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Criterion for noise-induced synchronization: application to colloidal alignment

Colloidal bodies of irregular shape rotate as they descend under gravity in solution. This rotational response provides a means of bringing a dispersion of identical bodies into a synchronized rotation with the same orientation using programmed forcing. We use the notion of statistical entropy to derive bounds on the rate of synchronization. These bounds apply generally to dynamical systems with stable periodic motion with a phase $ϕ(t)$, when subjected to an impulsive perturbation. The impulse causes a change of phase expressible as a phase map $ψ(ϕ)$. We derive an upper limit on the average change of entropy $\left<ΔH\right>$ in terms of this phase map; when this limit is negative, alignment must occur. For systems that have achieved a low entropy, the $\left<ΔH\right>$ approaches this upper limit.

preprint2013arXiv

Orientational ordering of colloidal dispersions by application of time dependent external forces

We present a method of organizing incoherent motion of a colloidal suspension to produce synchronized, coherent motion. This method exploits general features of rotational response to time-dependent forcing, and it does not require interaction between the particles. We report two methods of achieving orientational alignment of an ensemble of identical colloids by means of a time-dependent, but spatially uniform forcing: a) a piecewise constant force alternating between two directions and b) a force uniformly rotating about an axis. The physical origin of the forcing may be e.g., sedimentation or electrophoresis. We will demonstrate that these forcing methods achieve alignment both by analyzing the equations of motion and by simulation. We find the conditions guaranteeing alignment, discuss the limitations of these methods, and suggest possible applications. Examples of such forcing include electrophoresis and sedimentation.

preprint2012arXiv

Full alignment of colloidal objects by programmed forcing

By analysis and simulation we demonstrate two methods for achieving complete orientational alignment of a set of identical, asymmetric colloidal objects dispersed randomly in a fluid. Sedimentation or electrophoresis in a constant field can lead to partial alignment, in which the objects rotate about a common body axis, but the phases of rotation for these objects are random. We show that this phase disorder can be removed by two forms of programmed forcing. First, simply alternating the forcing between two directions reduces the statistical entropy of the orientation arbitrarily. Second, addition of a small rotating component to the applied field in analogy to magnetic resonance can lead to phase locking of the objects' orientation. We identify conditions for alignment of a broad class of generic objects and discuss practical limitations.

preprint2010arXiv

Bayesian algorithms for recovering structure from single-particle diffraction snapshots of unknown orientation: a comparison

The advent of X-ray Free Electron Lasers promises the possibility to determine the structure of individual particles such as microcrystallites, viruses and biomolecules from single-shot diffraction snapshots obtained before the particle is destroyed by the intense femtosecond pulse. This program requires the ability to determine the orientation of the particle giving rise to each snapshot at signal levels as low as ~10-2 photons/pixel. Two apparently different approaches have recently demonstrated this capability. Here we show they represent different implementations of the same fundamental approach, and identify the primary factors limiting their performance.