BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Boyce E. Griffith

Boyce E. Griffith contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical Analysisphysics.flu-dynphysics.comp-phmath.DSTissues and Organs

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

An Immersed Interface Method for Discrete Surfaces

Fluid-structure systems occur in a range of scientific and engineering applications. The immersed boundary(IB) method is a widely recognized and effective modeling paradigm for simulating fluid-structure interaction(FSI) in such systems, but a difficulty of the IB formulation is that the pressure and viscous stress are generally discontinuous at the interface. The conventional IB method regularizes these discontinuities, which typically yields low-order accuracy at these interfaces. The immersed interface method(IIM) is an IB-like approach to FSI that sharply imposes stress jump conditions, enabling higher-order accuracy, but prior applications of the IIM have been largely restricted to methods that rely on smooth representations of the interface geometry. This paper introduces an IIM that uses only a C0 representation of the interface,such as those provided by standard nodal Lagrangian FE methods. Verification examples for models with prescribed motion demonstrate that the method sharply resolves stress discontinuities along the IB while avoiding the need for analytic information of the interface geometry. We demonstrate that only the lowest-order jump conditions for the pressure and velocity gradient are required to realize global 2nd-order accuracy. Specifically,we show 2nd-order global convergence rate along with nearly 2nd-order local convergence in the Eulerian velocity, and between 1st-and 2nd-order global convergence rates along with 1st-order local convergence for the Eulerian pressure. We also show 2nd-order local convergence in the interfacial displacement and velocity along with 1st-order local convergence in the fluid traction. As a demonstration of the method's ability to tackle complex geometries,this approach is also used to simulate flow in an anatomical model of the inferior vena cava.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the Lagrangian-Eulerian Coupling in the Immersed Finite Element/Difference Method

The immersed boundary (IB) method is a non-body conforming approach to fluid-structure interaction (FSI) that uses an Eulerian description of the momentum, viscosity, and incompressibility of a coupled fluid-structure system and a Lagrangian description of the deformations, stresses, and resultant forces of the immersed structure. Integral transforms with Dirac delta function kernels couple the Eulerian and Lagrangian variables, and in practice, discretizations of these integral transforms use regularized delta function kernels. Many different kernel functions have been proposed, but prior numerical work investigating the impact of the choice of kernel function on the accuracy of the methodology has been limited. This work systematically studies the effect of the choice of regularized delta function in several FSI benchmark tests using the immersed finite element/difference (IFED) method, which is an extension of the IB method that uses a finite element structural discretizations combined with a Cartesian grid finite difference method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. The IFED formulation evaluates the regularized delta function on a collection of interaction points that can be chosen to be denser than the nodes of the Lagrangian mesh, and this study investigates the effect of varying the relative mesh widths of the Lagrangian and Eulerian discretizations. Our results indicate that kernels satisfying a commonly imposed even-odd condition require higher resolution to achieve similar accuracy as kernels that do not satisfy. We also find that narrower kernels are more robust and that structural meshes that are substantially coarser than the Cartesian grid can yield high accuracy for shear-dominated cases but not for cases with large normal forces. We verify our results in a large-scale FSI model of a bovine pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve in a pulse duplicator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An immersed interface-lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-structure interaction

An immersed interface-lattice Boltzmann method (II-LBM) is developed for modelling fluid-structure systems. The key element of this approach is the determination of the jump conditions that are satisfied by the distribution functions within the framework of the lattice Boltzmann method when forces are imposed along a surface immersed in an incompressible fluid. In this initial II-LBM, the discontinuity related to the normal portion of the interfacial force is sharply resolved by imposing the relevant jump conditions using an approach that is analogous to imposing the corresponding pressure jump condition in the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. We show that the jump conditions for the distribution functions are the same in both single-relaxation-time and multi-relaxation-time LBM formulations. Tangential forces are treated using the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method (IB-LBM). The performance of the II-LBM method is compared to both the direct forcing IB-LBM for rigid-body fluid-structure interaction, and the classical IB-LBM for elastic interfaces. Higher order accuracy is observed with the II-LBM as compared to the IB-LBM for selected benchmark problems. Because the jump conditions of the distribution function also satisfy the continuity of the velocity field across the interface, the error in the velocity field is much smaller for the II-LBM than the IB-LBM. The II-LBM is also demonstrated to provide superior volume conservation when simulating flexible boundaries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Models for plasma kinetics during simultaneous therapeutic plasma exchange and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

This paper focuses on the derivation and simulation of mathematical models describing new plasma fraction in blood for patients undergoing simultaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and therapeutic plasma exchange. Models for plasma exchange with either veno-arterial or veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are considered. Two classes of models are derived for each case, one in the form of an algebraic delay equation and another in the form of a system of delay differential equations. In special cases, our models reduce to single compartment ones for plasma exchange that have been validated with experimental data. We also show that the algebraic delay equations are forward Euler discretizations of the delay differential equations, with timesteps equal to transit times through model compartments. Numerical simulations are performed to compare different model types, to investigate the impact of plasma device port switching on the efficiency of the exchange process, and to study the sensitivity of the models to their parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A sharp interface method for an immersed viscoelastic solid

The immersed boundary-finite element method (IBFE) is an approach to describing the dynamics of an elastic structure immersed in an incompressible viscous fluid. In this formulation, there are discontinuities in the pressure and viscous stress at fluid-structure interfaces. The standard immersed boundary approach, which connects the Lagrangian and Eulerian variables via integral transforms with regularized Dirac delta function kernels, smooths out these discontinuities, which generally leads to low order accuracy. This paper describes an approach to accurately resolve pressure discontinuities for these types of formulations, in which the solid may undergo large deformations. Our strategy is to decompose the physical pressure field into a sum of two pressure-like fields, one defined on the entire computational domain, which includes both the fluid and solid subregions, and one defined only on the solid subregion. Each of these fields is continuous on its domain of definition, which enables high accuracy via standard discretization methods without sacrificing sharp resolution of the pressure discontinuity. Numerical tests demonstrate that this method improves rates of convergence for displacements, velocities, stresses, and pressures, as compared to the conventional IBFE method. Further, it produces much smaller errors at reasonable numbers of degrees of freedom. The performance of this method is tested on several cases with analytic solutions, a nontrivial benchmark problem of incompressible solid mechanics, and an example involving a thick, actively contracting torus.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access