Source author record

Blai Pié Valls

Blai Pié Valls appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Atomismo y Mecánica Cuántica

We discuss, from a historiographical point of view, which was the degree of certainty that the physicists directly involved in the birth of Quantum Mechanics (Heisenberg, Born, Jordan, Dirac and Schrödinger) gave to the atomistic hypothesis, starting from 1925, and until the celebration of the 5th Solvay Conference, in October 1927. In particular, we analyze how was tackled the problem of the free particle, and how that affected decisively the interpretations proposed for the new mechanics. We show that, despite focusing on such a narrow period of time, so close to those seminal years, practically all the questions which still prevail nowadays, were then already posed. Except in the case of Schrödinger, there hardly were changes of appreciation of the atomistic hypothesis.

preprint2015arXiv

Ehrenfest's adiabatic hypothesis in Bohr's quantum theory

It is widely known that Paul Ehrenfest formulated and applied his adiabatic hypothesis in the early 1910s. Niels Bohr, in his first attempt to construct a quantum theory in 1916, used it for fundamental purposes in a paper which eventually did not reach the press. He decided not to publish it after having received the new results by Sommerfeld in Munich. Two years later, Bohr published "On the quantum theory of line-spectra." There, the adiabatic hypothesis played an important role, although it appeared with another name: the principle of mechanical transformability. In the subsequent variations of his theory, Bohr never suppressed this principle completely. We discuss the role of Ehrenfest's principle in the works of Bohr, paying special attention to its relation to the correspondence principle. We will also consider how Ehrenfest faced Bohr's uses of his more celebrated contribution to quantum theory, as well as his own participation in the spreading of Bohr's ideas.