Source author record

Björn Engelmann

Björn Engelmann appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Logic in Computer Science Programming Languages Software Engineering

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

3topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

A Sound and Complete Hoare Logic for Dynamically-Typed, Object-Oriented Programs -- Extended Version --

A simple dynamically-typed, (purely) object-oriented language is defined. A structural operational semantics as well as a Hoare-style program logic for reasoning about programs in the language in multiple notions of correctness are given. The Hoare logic is proved to be both sound and (relative) complete and is -- to the best of our knowledge -- the first such logic presented for a dynamically-typed language.

preprint2015arXiv

Closing the Gap -- Formally Verifying Dynamically Typed Programs like Statically Typed Ones Using Hoare Logic -- Extended Version --

Dynamically typed object-oriented languages enable programmers to write elegant, reusable and extensible programs. However, with the current methodology for program verification, the absence of static type information creates significant overhead. Our proposal is two-fold: First, we propose a layer of abstraction hiding the complexity of dynamic typing when provided with sufficient type information. Since this essentially creates the illusion of verifying a statically-typed program, the effort required is equivalent to the statically-typed case. Second, we show how the required type information can be efficiently derived for all type-safe programs by integrating a type inference algorithm into Hoare logic, yielding a semi-automatic procedure allowing the user to focus on those typing problems really requiring his attention. While applying type inference to dynamically typed programs is a well-established method by now, our approach complements conventional soft typing systems by offering formal proof as a third option besides modifying the program (static typing) and accepting the presence of runtime type errors (dynamic typing).