Source author record

Binit Lukose

Binit Lukose appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

Structure and electronic structure of Metal-Organic Frameworks within the Density-Functional based Tight-Binding method

Density-functional based tight-binding is a powerful method to describe large molecules and materials. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs), materials with interesting catalytic properties and with very large surface areas have been developed and have become commercially available. Unit cells of MOFs typically include hundreds of atoms, which make the application of standard Density-Functional methods computationally very expensive, sometimes even unfeasible. The aim of this paper is to prepare and to validate the Self-Consistent Charge Density-Functional based Tight Binding (SCC-DFTB) method for MOFs containing Cu, Zn and Al metal centers. The method has been validated against full hybrid density-functional calculations for model clusters, against gradient corrected density-functional calculations for supercells, and against experiment. Moreover, the modular concept of MOF chemistry has been discussed on the basis of their electronic properties. We concentrate on MOFs comprising three common connector units: copper paddlewheels (HKUST-1), zinc oxide Zn4O tetrahedron (MOF-5, MOF-177, DUT-6 (MOF-205)) and aluminium oxide AlO4(OH)2 octahedron (MIL-53). We show that SCC-DFTB predicts structural parameters with a very good accuracy (with less than 5% deviation, even for adsorbed CO and H2O on HKUST-1), while adsorption energies differ by 12 kJ mol-1 or less for CO and water compared to DFT benchmark calculations.