BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Bingyang Ye

Bingyang Ye contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceComputation and Language

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Proof of Time: A Benchmark for Evaluating Scientific Idea Judgments

Large language models are increasingly being used to assess and forecast research ideas, yet we lack scalable ways to evaluate the quality of models' judgments about these scientific ideas. Towards this goal, we introduce PoT, a semi-verifiable benchmarking framework that links scientific idea judgments to downstream signals that become observable later (e.g., citations and shifts in researchers' agendas). PoT freezes a pre-cutoff snapshot of evidence in an offline sandbox and asks models to forecast post-cutoff outcomes, enabling verifiable evaluation when ground truth arrives, scalable benchmarking without exhaustive expert annotation, and analysis of human-model misalignment against signals such as peer-review awards. In addition, PoT provides a controlled testbed for agent-based research judgments that evaluate scientific ideas, comparing tool-using agents to non-agent baselines under prompt ablations and budget scaling. Across 30,000+ instances spanning four benchmark domains, we find that, compared with non-agent baselines, higher interaction budgets generally improve agent performance, while the benefit of tool use is strongly task-dependent. By combining time-partitioned, future-verifiable targets with an offline sandbox for tool use, PoT supports scalable evaluation of agents on future-facing scientific idea judgment tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

From Extreme Multi-label to Multi-class: A Hierarchical Approach for Automated ICD-10 Coding Using Phrase-level Attention

Clinical coding is the task of assigning a set of alphanumeric codes, referred to as ICD (International Classification of Diseases), to a medical event based on the context captured in a clinical narrative. The latest version of ICD, ICD-10, includes more than 70,000 codes. As this is a labor-intensive and error-prone task, automatic ICD coding of medical reports using machine learning has gained significant interest in the last decade. Existing literature has modeled this problem as a multi-label task. Nevertheless, such multi-label approach is challenging due to the extremely large label set size. Furthermore, the interpretability of the predictions is essential for the endusers (e.g., healthcare providers and insurance companies). In this paper, we propose a novel approach for automatic ICD coding by reformulating the extreme multi-label problem into a simpler multi-class problem using a hierarchical solution. We made this approach viable through extensive data collection to acquire phrase-level human coder annotations to supervise our models on learning the specific relations between the input text and predicted ICD codes. Our approach employs two independently trained networks, the sentence tagger and the ICD classifier, stacked hierarchically to predict a codeset for a medical report. The sentence tagger identifies focus sentences containing a medical event or concept relevant to an ICD coding. Using a supervised attention mechanism, the ICD classifier then assigns each focus sentence with an ICD code. The proposed approach outperforms strong baselines by large margins of 23% in subset accuracy, 18% in micro-F1, and 15% in instance based F-1. With our proposed approach, interpretability is achieved not through implicitly learned attention scores but by attributing each prediction to a particular sentence and words selected by human coders.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access