Source author record

Biljana Mileva Boshkoska

Biljana Mileva Boshkoska appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Occupation similarity through bipartite graphs

Similarity between occupations is a crucial piece of information when making career decisions. However, the notion of a single and unified occupation similarity measure is more of a limitation than an asset. The goal of the study is to assess multiple explainable occupation similarity measures that can provide different insights into inter-occupation relations. Several such measures are derived using the framework of bipartite graphs. Their viability is assessed on more than 450,000 job transitions occurring in Slovenia in the period between 2012 and 2021. The results support the hypothesis that several similarity measures are plausible and that they present different feasible career paths. The complete implementation and part of the datasets are available at https://repo.ijs.si/pboskoski/bipartite_job_similarity_code.

preprint2015arXiv

Quantifying the consistency of scientific databases

Science is a social process with far-reaching impact on our modern society. In the recent years, for the first time we are able to scientifically study the science itself. This is enabled by massive amounts of data on scientific publications that is increasingly becoming available. The data is contained in several databases such as Web of Science or PubMed, maintained by various public and private entities. Unfortunately, these databases are not always consistent, which considerably hinders this study. Relying on the powerful framework of complex networks, we conduct a systematic analysis of the consistency among six major scientific databases. We found that identifying a single "best" database is far from easy. Nevertheless, our results indicate appreciable differences in mutual consistency of different databases, which we interpret as recipes for future bibliometric studies.