Researcher profile

Bihong T. Chen

Bihong T. Chen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Effective connectivity signatures in major depressive disorder: fMRI study using a multi-site dataset

Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) primarily relies on the patient's self-reported symptoms and a clinical evaluation. Effective connectivity (EC) from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) analysis can reflect the directionality of connections between brain regions, making it a candidate method to classify MDD. This study used Granger causality analysis to extract EC features from a large multi-site MDD dataset. The ComBat algorithm and multivariate linear regression were used to harmonize site difference and to remove age and sex covariates, respectively. Two-sample t-tests and model-based feature selection methods were used to screen for highly discriminative EC features for MDD, and LightGBM was used to classify MDD. In this large-scale multi-site rs-fMRI dataset, 97 EC features deemed highly discriminative for MDD were screened. In the nested five-fold cross-validation, the best classification model with the 97 EC features achieved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 94.35%, 93.52%, and 95.25%, respectively. In another independent large dataset, which tested the generalization performance of the 97 EC features, the best classification models achieved 94.74%, 90.59%, and 96.75% for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively. This work demonstrated that EC had a reasonable discriminative ability and supported the notion for using EC to potentially assist clinical diagnosis of MDD.