Source author record

Bhaswati Bhattacharya

Bhaswati Bhattacharya appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

The Polarization Convention of the uGMRT in Band 4

We present an experiment performed to understand the polarization convention adopted for band 4 (550--900 MHz) of the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (uGMRT). For that we observed the pulsar B1702--19 in this band, both in interferometry and pulsar modes, and compare the results with its already known Stokes $I$, $Q$, $U$, $V$ profiles obtained with the Lovell telescope. We find that the results obtained from interferometry and pulsar modes of the uGMRT agree with each other. However, although the Stokes $U$ profile obtained with the uGMRT match with that obtained by the Lovell telescope, Stokes $Q$ and $V$ do not. This can be explained if the $X$ and $Y$ dipoles in this band, from which $R$ and $L$ are derived, are swapped w.r.t. the IAU convention. The swapping makes $RR^*$ and $LL^*$ of the uGMRT band 4 to be $LL^*$ and $RR^*$ respectively according to the IEEE convention. This implies that if we need to compare polarization measurements obtained in band 4 of the uGMRT with telescopes like Lovell, Parkes, Very Large Array etc. (all follow IEEE convention for defining right and left hand circular polarization), we must interchange $RR^*$ and $LL^*$, and change the sign of Stokes $Q$ for the uGMRT data. Note that this is the current convention for uGMRT band 4, and is likely to change in future once the swapping of the dipoles is taken care of. Once it is done, it will be notified in another technical report.