BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Bert Besser

Bert Besser appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

On the Approximation Performance of Degree Heuristics for Matching

In the design of greedy algorithms for the maximum cardinality matching problem the utilization of degree information when selecting the next edge is a well established and successful approach. We define the class of "degree sensitive" greedy matching algorithms, which allows us to analyze many well-known heuristics, and provide tight approximation guarantees under worst case tie breaking. We exhibit algorithms in this class with optimal approximation guarantee for bipartite graphs. In particular the Karp-Sipser algorithm, which picks an edge incident with a degree-1 node if possible and otherwise an arbitrary edge, turns out to be optimal with approximation guarantee D/(2D-2), where D is the maximum degree.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Approximation Bounds For Minimum Degree Matching

We consider the MINGREEDY strategy for Maximum Cardinality Matching. MINGREEDY repeatedly selects an edge incident with a node of minimum degree. For graphs of degree at most $Δ$ we show that MINGREEDY achieves approximation ratio at least $ \frac{Δ-1}{2Δ-3} $ in the worst case and that this performance is optimal among adaptive priority algorithms in the vertex model, which include many prominent greedy matching heuristics. Even when considering expected approximation ratios of randomized greedy strategies, no better worst case bounds are known for graphs of small degrees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Greedy Matching: Guarantees and Limitations

Since Tinhofer proposed the MinGreedy algorithm for maximum cardinality matching in 1984, several experimental studies found the randomized algorithm to perform excellently for various classes of random graphs and benchmark instances. In contrast, only few analytical results are known. We show that MinGreedy cannot improve on the trivial approximation ratio 1/2 whp., even for bipartite graphs. Our hard inputs seem to require a small number of high-degree nodes. This motivates an investigation of greedy algorithms on graphs with maximum degree D: We show that MinGreedy achieves a (D-1)/(2D-3)-approximation for graphs with D=3 and for D-regular graphs, and a guarantee of (D-1/2)/(2D-2) for graphs with maximum degree D. Interestingly, our bounds even hold for the deterministic MinGreedy that breaks all ties arbitrarily. Moreover, we investigate the limitations of the greedy paradigm, using the model of priority algorithms introduced by Borodin, Nielsen, and Rackoff. We study deterministic priority algorithms and prove a (D-1)/(2D-3)-inapproximability result for graphs with maximum degree D; thus, these greedy algorithms do not achieve a 1/2+eps-approximation and in particular the 2/3-approximation obtained by the deterministic MinGreedy for D=3 is optimal in this class. For k-uniform hypergraphs we show a tight 1/k-inapproximability bound. We also study fully randomized priority algorithms and give a 5/6-inapproximability bound. Thus, they cannot compete with matching algorithms of other paradigms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access