BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Benjamin Rossman

Benjamin Rossman appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityLogic in Computer Sciencemath.COData Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Monotone Circuit Lower Bounds from Robust Sunflowers

Robust sunflowers are a generalization of combinatorial sunflowers that have applications in monotone circuit complexity, DNF sparsification, randomness extractors, and recent advances on the Erdős-Rado sunflower conjecture. The recent breakthrough of Alweiss, Lovett, Wu and Zhang gives an improved bound on the maximum size of a $w$-set system that excludes a robust sunflower. In this paper, we use this result to obtain an $\exp(n^{1/2-o(1)})$ lower bound on the monotone circuit size of an explicit $n$-variate monotone function, improving the previous best known $\exp(n^{1/3-o(1)})$ due to Andreev and Harnik and Raz. We also show an $\exp(Ω(n))$ lower bound on the monotone arithmetic circuit size of a related polynomial. Finally, we introduce a notion of robust clique-sunflowers and use this to prove an $n^{Ω(k)}$ lower bound on the monotone circuit size of the CLIQUE function for all $k \le n^{1/3-o(1)}$, strengthening the bound of Alon and Boppana.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tree-depth and the Formula Complexity of Subgraph Isomorphism

For a fixed "pattern" graph $G$, the $\textit{colored $G$-subgraph isomorphism problem}$ (denoted $\mathrm{SUB}(G)$) asks, given an $n$-vertex graph $H$ and a coloring $V(H) \to V(G)$, whether $H$ contains a properly colored copy of $G$. The complexity of this problem is tied to parameterized versions of $\mathit{P}$ ${=}?$ $\mathit{NP}$ and $\mathit{L}$ ${=}?$ $\mathit{NL}$, among other questions. An overarching goal is to understand the complexity of $\mathrm{SUB}(G)$, under different computational models, in terms of natural invariants of the pattern graph $G$. In this paper, we establish a close relationship between the $\textit{formula complexity}$ of $\mathrm{SUB}$ and an invariant known as $\textit{tree-depth}$ (denoted $\mathrm{td}(G)$). $\mathrm{SUB}(G)$ is known to be solvable by monotone $\mathit{AC^0}$ formulas of size $O(n^{\mathrm{td}(G)})$. Our main result is an $n^{\tildeΩ(\mathrm{td}(G)^{1/3})}$ lower bound for formulas that are monotone $\textit{or}$ have sub-logarithmic depth. This complements a lower bound of Li, Razborov and Rossman (SICOMP 2017) relating tree-width and $\mathit{AC^0}$ circuit size. As a corollary, it implies a stronger homomorphism preservation theorem for first-order logic on finite structures (Rossman, ITCS 2017). The technical core of this result is an $n^{Ω(k)}$ lower bound in the special case where $G$ is a complete binary tree of height $k$, which we establish using the $\textit{pathset framework}$ introduced in (Rossman, SICOMP 2018). (The lower bound for general patterns follows via a recent excluded-minor characterization of tree-depth (Czerwiński et al, arXiv:1904.13077).) Additional results of this paper extend the pathset framework and improve upon both, the best known upper and lower bounds on the average-case formula size of $\mathrm{SUB}(G)$ when $G$ is a path.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

An Improved Homomorphism Preservation Theorem From Lower Bounds in Circuit Complexity

Previous work of the author [39] showed that the Homomorphism Preservation Theorem of classical model theory remains valid when its statement is restricted to finite structures. In this paper, we give a new proof of this result via a reduction to lower bounds in circuit complexity, specifically on the AC$^0$ formula size of the colored subgraph isomorphism problem. Formally, we show the following: if a first-order sentence $Φ$ of quantifier-rank $k$ is preserved under homomorphisms on finite structures, then it is equivalent on finite structures to an existential-positive sentence $Ψ$ of quantifier-rank $k^{O(1)}$. Quantitatively, this improves the result of [39], where the upper bound on the quantifier-rank of $Ψ$ is a non-elementary function of $k$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

An average-case depth hierarchy theorem for Boolean circuits

We prove an average-case depth hierarchy theorem for Boolean circuits over the standard basis of $\mathsf{AND}$, $\mathsf{OR}$, and $\mathsf{NOT}$ gates. Our hierarchy theorem says that for every $d \geq 2$, there is an explicit $n$-variable Boolean function $f$, computed by a linear-size depth-$d$ formula, which is such that any depth-$(d-1)$ circuit that agrees with $f$ on $(1/2 + o_n(1))$ fraction of all inputs must have size $\exp({n^{Ω(1/d)}}).$ This answers an open question posed by Håstad in his Ph.D. thesis. Our average-case depth hierarchy theorem implies that the polynomial hierarchy is infinite relative to a random oracle with probability 1, confirming a conjecture of Håstad, Cai, and Babai. We also use our result to show that there is no "approximate converse" to the results of Linial, Mansour, Nisan and Boppana on the total influence of small-depth circuits, thus answering a question posed by O'Donnell, Kalai, and Hatami. A key ingredient in our proof is a notion of \emph{random projections} which generalize random restrictions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The Average Sensitivity of Bounded-Depth Formulas

We show that unbounded fan-in boolean formulas of depth $d+1$ and size $s$ have average sensitivity $O(\frac{1}{d}\log s)^d$. In particular, this gives a tight $2^{Ω(d(n^{1/d}-1))}$ lower bound on the size of depth $d+1$ formulas computing the \textsc{parity} function. These results strengthen the corresponding $2^{Ω(n^{1/d})}$ and $O(\log s)^d$ bounds for circuits due to Håstad (1986) and Boppana (1997). Our proof technique studies a random process where the Switching Lemma is applied to formulas in an efficient manner.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Formulas vs. Circuits for Small Distance Connectivity

We give the first super-polynomial separation in the power of bounded-depth boolean formulas vs. circuits. Specifically, we consider the problem Distance $k(n)$ Connectivity, which asks whether two specified nodes in a graph of size $n$ are connected by a path of length at most $k(n)$. This problem is solvable (by the recursive doubling technique) on {\bf circuits} of depth $O(\log k)$ and size $O(kn^3)$. In contrast, we show that solving this problem on {\bf formulas} of depth $\log n/(\log\log n)^{O(1)}$ requires size $n^{Ω(\log k)}$ for all $k(n) \leq \log\log n$. As corollaries: (i) It follows that polynomial-size circuits for Distance $k(n)$ Connectivity require depth $Ω(\log k)$ for all $k(n) \leq \log\log n$. This matches the upper bound from recursive doubling and improves a previous $Ω(\log\log k)$ lower bound of Beame, Pitassi and Impagliazzo [BIP98]. (ii) We get a tight lower bound of $s^{Ω(d)}$ on the size required to simulate size-$s$ depth-$d$ circuits by depth-$d$ formulas for all $s(n) = n^{O(1)}$ and $d(n) \leq \log\log\log n$. No lower bound better than $s^{Ω(1)}$ was previously known for any $d(n) \nleq O(1)$. Our proof technique is centered on a new notion of pathset complexity, which roughly speaking measures the minimum cost of constructing a set of (partial) paths in a universe of size $n$ via the operations of union and relational join, subject to certain density constraints. Half of our proof shows that bounded-depth formulas solving Distance $k(n)$ Connectivity imply upper bounds on pathset complexity. The other half is a combinatorial lower bound on pathset complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The Homomorphism Domination Exponent

We initiate a study of the homomorphism domination exponent of a pair of graphs F and G, defined as the maximum real number c such that |Hom(F,T)| \geq |Hom(G,T)|^c for every graph T. The problem of determining whether HDE(F,G) \geq 1 is known as the homomorphism domination problem and its decidability is an important open question arising in the theory of relational databases. We investigate the combinatorial and computational properties of the homomorphism domination exponent, proving upper and lower bounds and isolating classes of graphs F and G for which HDE(F,G) is computable. In particular, we present a linear program computing HDE(F,G) in the special case where F is chordal and G is series-parallel.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2007arXiv

Interactive Small-Step Algorithms I: Axiomatization

In earlier work, the Abstract State Machine Thesis -- that arbitrary algorithms are behaviorally equivalent to abstract state machines -- was established for several classes of algorithms, including ordinary, interactive, small-step algorithms. This was accomplished on the basis of axiomatizations of these classes of algorithms. Here we extend the axiomatization and, in a companion paper, the proof, to cover interactive small-step algorithms that are not necessarily ordinary. This means that the algorithms (1) can complete a step without necessarily waiting for replies to all queries from that step and (2) can use not only the environment's replies but also the order in which the replies were received.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2007arXiv

Interactive Small-Step Algorithms II: Abstract State Machines and the<br> Characterization Theorem

In earlier work, the Abstract State Machine Thesis -- that arbitrary algorithms are behaviorally equivalent to abstract state machines -- was established for several classes of algorithms, including ordinary, interactive, small-step algorithms. This was accomplished on the basis of axiomatizations of these classes of algorithms. In Part I (Interactive Small-Step Algorithms I: Axiomatization), the axiomatization was extended to cover interactive small-step algorithms that are not necessarily ordinary. This means that the algorithms (1) can complete a step without necessarily waiting for replies to all queries from that step and (2) can use not only the environment's replies but also the order in which the replies were received. In order to prove the thesis for algorithms of this generality, we extend here the definition of abstract state machines to incorporate explicit attention to the relative timing of replies and to the possible absence of replies. We prove the characterization theorem for extended abstract state machines with respect to general algorithms as axiomatized in Part I.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

An O(n^3)-Time Algorithm for Tree Edit Distance

The {\em edit distance} between two ordered trees with vertex labels is the minimum cost of transforming one tree into the other by a sequence of elementary operations consisting of deleting and relabeling existing nodes, as well as inserting new nodes. In this paper, we present a worst-case $O(n^3)$-time algorithm for this problem, improving the previous best $O(n^3\log n)$-time algorithm~\cite{Klein}. Our result requires a novel adaptive strategy for deciding how a dynamic program divides into subproblems (which is interesting in its own right), together with a deeper understanding of the previous algorithms for the problem. We also prove the optimality of our algorithm among the family of \emph{decomposition strategy} algorithms--which also includes the previous fastest algorithms--by tightening the known lower bound of $Ω(n^2\log^2 n)$~\cite{Touzet} to $Ω(n^3)$, matching our algorithm's running time. Furthermore, we obtain matching upper and lower bounds of $Θ(n m^2 (1 + \log \frac{n}{m}))$ when the two trees have different sizes $m$ and~$n$, where $m < n$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access