Researcher profile

B. Zauner

B. Zauner contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Geometric Constraint on Residue Phases: Resolving the N(2190) Anomaly and Diagnosing Exotic States

We derive a parameter-free geometric constraint on residue phases dictated by the pole-threshold angle. Using the N(2190) anomaly as a test case, this constraint reveals a sign ambiguity in prior data; correcting it yields a phase of $-28^\circ\pm10^\circ$, matching our prediction. This consistency validates the method as a model-independent diagnostic for distinguishing compact from molecular states, offering a rigorous tool for exotic spectroscopy.

preprint2013arXiv

Model independent extraction of the pole and Breit-Wigner resonance parameters

We show that a slightly modified Breit-Wigner formula can successfully describe the total cross section even for the broad resonances, from light rho(770) to the heavy Z boson. In addition to mass, width, and branching fraction, we include another resonance parameter that turns out to be directly related to the pole residue phase. The new formula has two mathematically equivalent forms: one with the pole, and the other with the Breit-Wigner parameters.

preprint2010arXiv

Model Independent Extraction of S-Matrix Poles from Experimental Data

By separating data points close to a resonance into intervals, and fitting all possible intervals to a simple pole with constant coherently added background, we obtained a substantial number of convergent fits. After a carefully chosen set of statistical constraints was imposed, we calculated the average of a resonance pole position from the statistically acceptable results. We used this method to find pole positions of Z and N(1440) resonances, and to show that the strong discrepancy between the old and new measurements of the Upsilon(11020) mass stems from specious comparison of the Upsilon(11020) pole with its Breit-Wigner mass.

preprint2009arXiv

Comment on "Mass and K Lambda coupling of N*(1535)"

It is argued in [1] that when the strong coupling to the K Lambda channel is considered, Breit-Wigner mass of the lightest orbital excitation of the nucleon N(1535) shifts to a lower value. The new value turned out to be smaller than the mass of the lightest radial excitation N(1440), which effectively solved the long-standing problem of conventional constituent quark models. In this Comment we show that it is not the Breit-Wigner mass of N(1535) that is decreased, but its bare mass. [1] B. C. Liu and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 042002 (2006).