Researcher profile

B. Svendsen

B. Svendsen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Development and comparison of spectral algorithms for numerical modeling of the quasi-static mechanical behavior of inhomogeneous materials

In the current work, a number of algorithms are developed and compared for the numerical solution of periodic (quasi-static) linear elastic mechanical boundary-value problems (BVPs) based on two different discretizations of Fourier series. The first is standard and based on the trapezoidal approximation of the Fourier mode integral, resulting in trapezoidal discretization (TD) of the truncated Fourier series. Less standard is the second discretization based on piecewise-constant approximation of the Fourier mode integrand, yielding a piecewise-constant discretization (PCD) of this series. Employing these, fixed-point algorithms are formulated via Green-function preconditioning (GFP) and finite-difference discretization (of differential operators; FDD). In particular, in the context of PCD, this includes an algorithm based on the so-called "discrete Green operator" (DGO) recently introduced by Eloh et al. (2019), which employs GFP, but not FDD. For computational comparisons, the (classic) benchmark case of a cubic inclusion embedded in a matrix (e.g., Suquet, 1997; Willot, 2015) is employed. Both discontinuous and smooth transitions in elastic stiffness at the matrix-inclusion (MI) interface are considered. In the context of both TD and PCD, a number of GFP- and FDD-based algorithms are developed. Among these, one based on so-called averaged-forward-backward-differencing (AFB) is shown to result in the greatest improvement in convergence rate. As it turns out, AFB is equivalent to the "rotated scheme" (R) of Willot (2015) in the context of TD. In the context of PCD, comparison of the performance and convergence behavior of AFB/R- and DGO-based algorithms shows that the former is more efficient than the latter for larger phase contrasts.