BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
We study the ring extensions R \subseteq T having the same set of prime ideals provided Nil(R) is a divided prime ideal. Some conditions are given under which no such T exist properly containing R. Using idealization theory, the examples are also discussed to strengthen the results.
In this note, we show that a part of [5, Remark 2.2] is not correct. Some conditions are given under which the same holds.
The notion of maximal non valuative domain is introduced and characterized. An integral domain R is called a maximal non valuative domain if R is not a valuative domain but every proper overring of R is a valuative domain. Maximal non valuative domains have at most four maximal ideals. Various properties of maximal non valuative domains are discussed. Conditions are given under which pseudo-valuation domains and maximal non pseudo-valuation domains are maximal non valuative domains.
Let R be a commutative ring with identity. The ring R×R can be viewed as an extension of R via the diagonal map Δ:R↪R×R, given by Δ(r)=(r,r) for all r∈R. It is shown that, for any a,b∈R, the extension Δ(R)[(a,b)]⊂R×R is a minimal ring extension if and only if the ideal <a−b> is a maximal ideal of R. A complete classification of maximal subrings of R(+)R is also given. The minimal ring extension of a von Neumann regular ring R is either a von Neumann regular ring or the idealization R(+)R/m where m∈Max(R). If R⊂T is a minimal ring extension and T is an integral domain, then (R:T)=0 if and only if R is a field and T is a minimal field extension of R, or RJ is a valuation ring of altitude one and TJ is its quotient field.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.