Source author record

Atalay Mert İleri

Atalay Mert İleri appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms Databases

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

2topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2015arXiv

On Longest Repeat Queries

Repeat finding in strings has important applications in subfields such as computational biology. Surprisingly, all prior work on repeat finding did not consider the constraint on the locality of repeats. In this paper, we propose and study the problem of finding longest repetitive substrings covering particular string positions. We propose an $O(n)$ time and space algorithm for finding the longest repeat covering every position of a string of size $n$. Our work is optimal since the reading and the storage of an input string of size $n$ takes $O(n)$ time and space. Because any substring of a repeat is also a repeat, our solution to longest repeat queries effectively provides a "stabbing" tool for practitioners for finding most of the repeats that cover particular string positions.

preprint2014arXiv

Shortest Unique Substring Query Revisited

We revisit the problem of finding shortest unique substring (SUS) proposed recently by [6]. We propose an optimal $O(n)$ time and space algorithm that can find an SUS for every location of a string of size $n$. Our algorithm significantly improves the $O(n^2)$ time complexity needed by [6]. We also support finding all the SUSes covering every location, whereas the solution in [6] can find only one SUS for every location. Further, our solution is simpler and easier to implement and can also be more space efficient in practice, since we only use the inverse suffix array and longest common prefix array of the string, while the algorithm in [6] uses the suffix tree of the string and other auxiliary data structures. Our theoretical results are validated by an empirical study that shows our algorithm is much faster and more space-saving than the one in [6].