Source author record

Arjana Žitnik

Arjana Žitnik appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.CO math.QA

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2015arXiv

Half-arc-transitive graphs of arbitrary even valency greater than 2

A half-arc-transitive graph is a regular graph that is both vertex- and edge-transitive, but is not arc-transitive. If such a graph has finite valency, then its valency is even, and greater than $2$. In 1970, Bouwer proved that there exists a half-arc-transitive graph of every even valency greater than 2, by giving a construction for a family of graphs now known as $B(k,m,n)$, defined for every triple $(k,m,n)$ of integers greater than $1$ with $2^m \equiv 1 \mod n$. In each case, $B(k,m,n)$ is a $2k$-valent vertex- and edge-transitive graph of order $mn^{k-1}$, and Bouwer showed that $B(k,6,9)$ is half-arc-transitive for all $k > 1$. For almost 45 years the question of exactly which of Bouwer's graphs are half-arc-transitive and which are arc-transitive has remained open, despite many attempts to answer it. In this paper, we use a cycle-counting argument to prove that almost all of the graphs constructed by Bouwer are half-arc-transitive. In fact, we prove that $B(k,m,n)$ is arc-transitive only when $n = 3$, or $(k,n) = (2,5)$, % and $m$ is a multiple of $4$, or $(k,m,n) = (2,3,7)$ or $(2,6,7)$ or $(2,6,21)$. In particular, $B(k,m,n)$ is half-arc-transitive whenever $m > 6$ and $n > 5$. This gives an easy way to prove that there are infinitely many half-arc-transitive graphs of each even valency $2k > 2$.

preprint2015arXiv

Vertex-transitive graphs and their arc-types

Let $X$ be a finite vertex-transitive graph of valency $d$, and let $A$ be the full automorphism group of $X$. Then the arc-type of $X$ is defined in terms of the sizes of the orbits of the action of the stabiliser $A_v$ of a given vertex $v$ on the set of arcs incident with $v$. Specifically, the arc-type is the partition of $d$ as the sum $$n_1 + n_2 + \dots + n_t + (m_1 + m_1) + (m_2 + m_2) + \dots + (m_s + m_s),$$ where $n_1, n_2, \dots, n_t$ are the sizes of the self-paired orbits, and $m_1,m_1, m_2,m_2, \dots, m_s,m_s$ are the sizes of the non-self-paired orbits, in descending order. In this paper, we find the arc-types of several families of graphs. Also we show that the arc-type of a Cartesian product of two `relatively prime' graphs is the natural sum of their arc-types. Then using these observations, we show that with the exception of $1+1$ and $(1+1)$, every partition as defined above is realisable, in the sense that there exists at least one graph with the given partition as its arc-type.

preprint2014arXiv

Combinatorial configurations, quasiline arrangements, and systems of curves on surfaces

It is well known that not every combinatorial configuration admits a geometric realization with points and lines. Moreover, some of them do not even admit realizations with pseudoline arrangements, i.e., they are not topological. In this paper we provide a new topological representation by using and essentially generalizing the topological representation of oriented matroids in rank 3. These representations can also be interpreted as curve arrangements on surfaces. In particular, we generalize the notion of a pseudoline arrangement to the notion of a quasiline arrangement by relaxing the condition that two pseudolines meet exactly once and show that every combinatorial configuration can be realized as a quasiline arrangement in the real projective plane. We also generalize well-known tools from pseudoline arrangements such as sweeps or wiring diagrams. A quasiline arrangement with selected vertices belonging to the configuration can be viewed as a map on a closed surface. Such a map can be used to distinguish between two "distinct" realizations of a combinatorial configuration as a quasiline arrangement.

preprint2013arXiv

Distance-regular graphs of $q$-Racah type and the universal Askey-Wilson algebra

Let $\C$ denote the field of complex numbers, and fix a nonzero $q \in \C$ such that $q^4 \ne 1$. Define a $\C$-algebra $Δ_q$ by generators and relations in the following way. The generators are $A,B,C$. The relations assert that each of $A+\frac{qBC-q^{-1}CB}{q^2-q^{-2}}$, $B+\frac{qCA-q^{-1}AC}{q^2-q^{-2}}$, $C+\frac{qAB-q^{-1}BA}{q^2-q^{-2}}$ is central in $Δ_q$. The algebra $Δ_q$ is called the universal Askey-Wilson algebra. Let $Γ$ denote a distance-regular graph that has $q$-Racah type. Fix a vertex $x$ of $Γ$ and let $T=T(x)$ denote the corresponding subconstituent algebra. In this paper we discuss a relationship between $Δ_q$ and $T$. Assuming that every irreducible $T$-module is thin, we display a surjective $\C$-algebra homomorphism $Δ_q \to T$. This gives a $Δ_q$ action on the standard module of $T$.

preprint2012arXiv

GI-graphs and their groups

The class of generalized Petersen graphs was introduced by Coxeter in the 1950s. Frucht, Graver and Watkins determined the automorphism groups of generalized Petersen graphs in 1971, and much later, Nedela and Škoviera and (independently) Lovrečič-Saražin characterised those which are Cayley graphs. In this paper we extend the class of generalized Petersen graphs to a class of GI-graphs. For any positive integer n and any sequence j_0,j_1,....,j_{t-1} of integers mod n, the GI-graph GI(n;j_0,j_1,....,j_{t-1}) is a (t+1)-valent graph on the vertex set Z_t x Z_n, with edges of two kinds: - an edge from (s,v) to (s',v), for all distinct s,s' in Z_t and all v in Z_n, - edges from (s,v) to (s,v+j_s) and (s,v-j_s), for all s in Z_t and v in Z_n. By classifying different kinds of automorphisms, we describe the automorphism group of each GI-graph, and determine which GI-graphs are vertex-transitive and which are Cayley graphs. A GI-graph can be edge-transitive only when t < 4 or equivalently, for valence at most 4. We present a unit-distance drawing of a remarkable GI(7;1,2,3).