BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ardeshir Hanifi

Ardeshir Hanifi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.flu-dynmath.CV

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Stability of Two-dimensional Potential Flows Using Bicomplex Numbers

The use of the complex velocity potential and the complex velocity is widely disseminated in the study of two-dimensional incompressible potential flows. The advantages of working with complex analytical functions made this representation of the flow ubiquitous in the field of theoretical aerodynamics. However, this representation is not usually employed in linear stability studies, where the representation of the velocity as real vectors is preferred by most authors, in order to allow the representation of the perturbation as the complex exponential function. Some of the classical attempts to use the complex velocity potential in stability studies suffer from formal errors. In this work, we present a framework that reconciles these two complex representations using bicomplex numbers. This framework is applied to the stability of the von Kármán vortex street and a generalized formula is found. It is shown that the classical results of the symmetric and staggered von Kármán vortex streets are just particular cases of the generalized dynamical system in bicomplex formulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

On the role of actuation for the control of streaky structures in boundary layers

This work deals with the closed-loop control of streaky structures induced by free-stream turbulence in a zero-pressure gradient, transitional boundary layer, by means of localized sensors and actuators. A linear quadratic gaussian regulator is considered along with a system identification technique to build reduced-order models for control. Three actuators are developed with different spatial supports, corresponding to a baseline shape with only vertical forcing, and to two other shapes obtained by different optimization procedures. A computationally efficient method is derived to obtain an actuator which aims to induce the exact structures which are inside the boundary layer, given in terms of their first spectral proper orthogonal decomposition mode, and an actuator that maximizes the energy of induced downstream structures. Two free-stream turbulence levels were evaluated, corresponding to 3.0% and 3.5%, and closed-loop control is applied in large-eddy simulations of transitional boundary layers. All three actuators lead to significant delays in the transition to turbulence and were shown to be robust to mild variations in the free-stream turbulence levels. Differences are understood in terms of the SPOD of actuation and FST-induced fields along with the causality of the control scheme. The actuator optimized to generate the leading downstream SPOD mode, representing the streaks in the open-loop flow, leads to the highest transition delay, which can be understood due to its capability of closely cancelling structures in the boundary layer. However, it is shown that even with the actuator located downstream of the input measurement it may become impossible to cancel incoming disturbances in a causal way, depending on the wall-normal position of the output and on the actuator considered, which limits sensor and actuator placement capable of good closed-loop performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access