Source author record

Arash Ahadi

Arash Ahadi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.CO Computational Complexity Discrete Mathematics Data Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

On the maximum number of non attacking rooks on a high-dimensional simplicial chessboard

The simplicial rook graph ${\rm \mathcal{SR}}(m,n)$ is the graph whose vertices are vectors in $ \mathbb{N}^m$ such that for each vector the summation of its coordinates is $n$ and two vertices are adjacent if their corresponding vectors differ in exactly two coordinates. Martin and Wagner (Graphs Combin. (2015) 31:1589--1611) asked about the independence number of ${\rm \mathcal{SR}}(m,n)$ that is the maximum number of non attacking rooks which can be placed on a $(m-1)$-dimensional simplicial chessboard of side length $n+1$. In this work, we solve this problem and show that $α({\rm \mathcal{SR}}(m,n))=\big(1-o(1)\big)\frac{\binom{n+m-1}{n}}{m}$. We also prove that for the domination number of rook graphs we have $γ({\rm \mathcal{SR}}(m, n))= Θ(n^{m-2})$. Moreover we show that these graphs are Hamiltonian. The cyclic simplicial rook graph ${\rm \mathcal{CSR}}(m,n)$ is the graph whose vertices are vectors in $\mathbb{Z}^{m}_{n}$ such that for each vector the summation of its coordinates modulo $n$ is $0$ and two vertices are adjacent if their corresponding vectors differ in exactly two coordinates. In this work we determine several properties of these graphs such as independence number, chromatic number and automorphism group. Among other results, we also prove that computing the distance between two vertices of a given ${\rm \mathcal{CSR}}(m,n)$ is $ \mathbf{NP}$-hard in terms of $n$ and $m$.

preprint2016arXiv

The inapproximability for the (0,1)-additive number

An {\it additive labeling} of a graph $G$ is a function $ \ell :V(G) \rightarrow\mathbb{N}$, such that for every two adjacent vertices $ v $ and $ u$ of $ G $, $ \sum_{w \sim v}\ell(w)\neq \sum_{w \sim u}\ell(w) $ ($ x \sim y $ means that $ x $ is joined to $y$). The {\it additive number} of $ G $, denoted by $η(G)$, is the minimum number $k $ such that $ G $ has a additive labeling $ \ell :V(G) \rightarrow \mathbb{N}_k$. The {\it additive choosability} of a graph $G$, denoted by $η_{\ell}(G) $, is the smallest number $k$ such that $G$ has an additive labeling for any assignment of lists of size $k$ to the vertices of $G$, such that the label of each vertex belongs to its own list. Seamone (2012) \cite{a80} conjectured that for every graph $G$, $η(G)= η_{\ell}(G)$. We give a negative answer to this conjecture and we show that for every $k$ there is a graph $G$ such that $ η_{\ell}(G)- η(G) \geq k$. A {\it $(0,1)$-additive labeling} of a graph $G$ is a function $ \ell :V(G) \rightarrow\{0,1\}$, such that for every two adjacent vertices $ v $ and $ u$ of $ G $, $ \sum_{w \sim v}\ell(w)\neq \sum_{w \sim u}\ell(w) $. A graph may lack any $(0,1)$-additive labeling. We show that it is $ \mathbf{NP} $-complete to decide whether a $(0,1)$-additive labeling exists for some families of graphs such as perfect graphs and planar triangle-free graphs. For a graph $G$ with some $(0,1)$-additive labelings, the $(0,1)$-additive number of $G$ is defined as $ σ_{1} (G) = \min_{\ell \in Γ}\sum_{v\in V(G)}\ell(v) $ where $Γ$ is the set of $(0,1)$-additive labelings of $G$. We prove that given a planar graph that admits a $(0,1)$-additive labeling, for all $ \varepsilon >0 $, approximating the $(0,1)$-additive number within $ n^{1-\varepsilon} $ is $ \mathbf{NP} $-hard.

preprint2014arXiv

On the complexity of deciding whether the regular number is at most two

The regular number of a graph G denoted by reg(G) is the minimum number of subsets into which the edge set of G can be partitioned so that the subgraph induced by each subset is regular. In this work we answer to the problem posed as an open problem in A. Ganesan et al. (2012) [3] about the complexity of determining the regular number of graphs. We show that computation of the regular number for connected bipartite graphs is NP-hard. Furthermore, we show that, determining whether reg(G) = 2 for a given connected 3-colorable graph G is NP-complete. Also, we prove that a new variant of the Monotone Not-All-Equal 3-Sat problem is NP-complete.

preprint2013arXiv

The Complexity of the Proper Orientation Number

Graph orientation is a well-studied area of graph theory. A proper orientation of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is an orientation $D$ of $E(G)$ such that for every two adjacent vertices $ v $ and $ u $, $ d^{-}_{D}(v) \neq d^{-}_{D}(u)$ where $d_{D}^{-}(v)$ is the number of edges with head $v$ in $D$. The proper orientation number of $G$ is defined as $ \overrightarrowχ (G) =\displaystyle \min_{D\in Γ} \displaystyle\max_{v\in V(G)} d^{-}_{D}(v) $ where $Γ$ is the set of proper orientations of $G$. We have $ χ(G)-1 \leq \overrightarrowχ (G)\leq Δ(G) $. We show that, it is $ \mathbf{NP} $-complete to decide whether $\overrightarrowχ(G)=2$, for a given planar graph $G$. Also, we prove that there is a polynomial time algorithm for determining the proper orientation number of 3-regular graphs. In sharp contrast, we will prove that this problem is $ \mathbf{NP} $-hard for 4-regular graphs.

preprint2011arXiv

On Rainbow Connection of Strongly Regular Graphs

An edge-colored graph $G$ is rainbow connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph $G$, denoted $rc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow connected. We prove if $G$ is a connected strongly $r$-regular graph and $r\geq 600$, then $rc(G)\leq3$. Specially, there is a constant $c$ such that $rc(G)\leq c$ for any connected strongly regular graph $G$.

preprint2010arXiv

On the Lucky labeling of Graphs

Suppose the vertices of a graph $G$ were labeled arbitrarily by positive integers, and let $Sum(v)$ denote the sum of labels over all neighbors of vertex $v$. A labeling is lucky if the function $Sum$ is a proper coloring of $G$, that is, if we have $Sum(u) \neq Sum(v)$ whenever $u$ and $v$ are adjacent. The least integer $k$ for which a graph $G$ has a lucky labeling from the set $\lbrace 1, 2, ...,k\rbrace$ is the lucky number of $G$, denoted by $η(G)$. We will prove, for every graph $G$ other than $ K_{2} $, $\frac{w}{n-w+1}\leqη(G) \leq Δ^{2} $ and we present an algorithm for lucky labeling of $ G $.