Source author record

Apurba Bera

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

3 publications

preprint2020arXiv

Radio emission from a decade old Type I superluminous supernova, PTF10hgi: Comparison with FRB121102

We perform a comparative study between the only radio detected Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN) PTF10hgi, and the most active repeating fast radio burst FRB121102. This study has its root in the hypothesized FRB-SLSN connection that states that magnetars born in SLSN can power FRBs. The wideband spectrum (0.6--15 GHz) of PTF10hgi presented here, provides strong evidence for the magnetar wind nebular origin of the radio emission. The same spectrum also enables us to make robust estimates of the radius and the magnetic field of the radio emitting region and demonstrates that the nebula is powered by the rotational energy of the magnetar. This spectrum is then compared with that of FRB121102 which we extend down to 400 MHz using archival data. The newly added measurements put very tight constraint on the emission models of the compact persistent source associated with FRB121102. We find that while both sources can be powered by the rotational energy of the underlying magnetar, the average energy injection rate is much higher in FRB121102. Hence, we hypothesise that, if PTF10hgi is indeed emitting fast radio bursts, those will be much weaker energetically than those from FRB121102.

preprint2016arXiv

On modelling the Fast Radio Burst (FRB) population and event rate predictions

Assuming that Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are of extragalactic origin, we have developed a formalism to predict the FRB detection rate and the redshift distribution of the detected events for a telescope with given parameters. We have adopted FRB 110220, for which the emitted pulse energy is estimated to be E0=5.4×1033JE_0 = 5.4 \times 10^{33}J, as the reference event. The formalism requires us to assume models for (1) pulse broadening due to scattering in the ionized inter-galactic medium - we consider two different models for this, (2) the frequency spectrum of the emitted pulse - we consider a power law model Eν∝ν−αE_ν \propto ν^{-α} with −5≤α≤5-5 \leq α\leq 5, and (3) the comoving number density of the FRB occurrence rate n(E,wi,z)n(E,w_i,z) - we ignore the z dependence and assume a fixed intrinsic pulse width wi=1w_i = 1ms for all the FRBs. The distribution of the emitted pulse energy EE is modelled through (a) a delta-function where all the FRBs have the same energy E=E0E = E_0 , and (b) a Schechter luminosity function where the energies have a spread around E0E_0. The models are all normalized using the 4 FRBs detected by Thornton et al. (2013). Our model predictions for the Parkes telescope are all consistent with the inferred redshift distribution of the fourteen FRBs detected there to date. We also find that scattering places an upper limit on the redshift of the FRBs detectable by a given telescope; for the Parkes telescope this is z∼2z \sim 2. Considering the upcoming Ooty Wide Field Array, we predict a FRB detection rate of ∼0.01\sim 0.01 to ∼103\sim 10^3 per day.

preprint2015arXiv

The effect of non-Gaussianity on error predictions for the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) 21-cm power spectrum

The Epoch of Reionization (EoR) 21-cm signal is expected to become increasingly non-Gaussian as reionization proceeds. We have used semi-numerical simulations to study how this affects the error predictions for the EoR 21-cm power spectrum. We expect SNR=NkSNR=\sqrt{N_k} for a Gaussian random field where NkN_k is the number of Fourier modes in each kk bin. We find that non-Gaussianity is important at high SNRSNR where it imposes an upper limit [SNR]l[SNR]_l. For a fixed volume VV, it is not possible to achieve SNR>[SNR]lSNR > [SNR]_l even if NkN_k is increased. The value of [SNR]l[SNR]_l falls as reionization proceeds, dropping from ∼500\sim 500 at xˉHI=0.8−0.9\bar{x}_{HI} = 0.8-0.9 to ∼10\sim 10 at xˉHI=0.15\bar{x}_{HI} = 0.15 for a [150.08 Mpc]3[150.08\, {\rm Mpc}]^3 simulation. We show that it is possible to interpret [SNR]l[SNR]_l in terms of the trispectrum, and we expect [SNR]l∝V[SNR]_l \propto \sqrt{V} if the volume is increased. For SNR≪[SNR]lSNR \ll [SNR]_l we find SNR=Nk/ASNR = \sqrt{N_k}/A with A∼0.95−1.75A \sim 0.95 - 1.75, roughly consistent with the Gaussian prediction. We present a fitting formula for the SNRSNR as a function of NkN_k, with two parameters AA and [SNR]l[SNR]_l that have to be determined using simulations. Our results are relevant for predicting the sensitivity of different instruments to measure the EoR 21-cm power spectrum, which till date have been largely based on the Gaussian assumption.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.