Researcher profile

Antal Iványi

Antal Iványi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

Testing of random matrices

Let $n$ be a positive integer and $X = [x_{ij}]_{1 \leq i, j \leq n}$ be an $n \times n$\linebreak \noindent sized matrix of independent random variables having joint uniform distribution $$\hbox{Pr} {x_{ij} = k \hbox{for} 1 \leq k \leq n} = \frac{1}{n} \quad (1 \leq i, j \leq n) \koz. $$ A realization $\mathcal{M} = [m_{ij}]$ of $X$ is called \textit{good}, if its each row and each column contains a permutation of the numbers $1, 2,..., n$. We present and analyse four typical algorithms which decide whether a given realization is good.

preprint2010arXiv

Reconstruction of complete interval tournaments

Let $a, b$ and $n$ be nonnegative integers $(b \geq a, \ b > 0, \ n \geq 1)$, $\mathcal{G}_n(a,b)$ be a multigraph on $n$ vertices in which any pair of vertices is connected with at least $a$ and at most $b$ edges and \textbf{v =} $(v_1, v_2, ..., v_n)$ be a vector containing $n$ nonnegative integers. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of such orientation of the edges of $\mathcal{G}_n(a,b)$, that the resulted out-degree vector equals to \textbf{v}. We describe a reconstruction algorithm. In worst case checking of \textbf{v} requires $Θ(n)$ time and the reconstruction algorithm works in $O(bn^3)$ time. Theorems of H. G. Landau (1953) and J. W. Moon (1963) on the score sequences of tournaments are special cases $b = a = 1$ resp. $b = a \geq 1$ of our result.

preprint2010arXiv

Reconstruction of complete interval tournaments. II

Let $a, \ b \ (b \geq a)$ and $n \ (n \geq 2)$ be nonnegative integers and let $\mathcal{T}(a,b,n)$ be the set of such generalised tournaments, in which every pair of distinct players is connected at most with $b$, and at least with $a$ arcs. In \cite{Ivanyi2009} we gave a necessary and sufficient condition to decide whether a given sequence of nonnegative integers $D = (d_1, d_2,..., d_n)$ can be realized as the out-degree sequence of a $T \in \mathcal{T}(a,b,n)$. Extending the results of \cite{Ivanyi2009} we show that for any sequence of nonnegative integers $D$ there exist $f$ and $g$ such that some element $T \in \mathcal{T}(g,f,n)$ has $D$ as its out-degree sequence, and for any $(a,b,n)$-tournament $T'$ with the same out-degree sequence $D$ hold $a\leq g$ and $b\geq f$. We propose a $Θ(n)$ algorithm to determine $f$ and $g$ and an $O(d_n n^2)$ algorithm to construct a corresponding tournament $T$.

preprint2010arXiv

Score lists in multipartite hypertournaments

Given non-negative integers $n_{i}$ and $α_{i}$ with $0 \leq α_{i} \leq n_i$ $(i=1,2,...,k)$, an $[α_{1},α_{2},...,α_{k}]$-$k$-partite hypertournament on $\sum_{1}^{k}n_{i}$ vertices is a $(k+1)$-tuple $(U_{1},U_{2},...,U_{k},E)$, where $U_{i}$ are $k$ vertex sets with $|U_{i}|=n_{i}$, and $E$ is a set of $\sum_{1}^{k}α_{i}$-tuples of vertices, called arcs, with exactly $α_{i}$ vertices from $U_{i}$, such that any $\sum_{1}^{k}α_{i}$ subset $\cup_{1}^{k}U_{i}^{\prime}$ of $\cup_{1}^{k}U_{i}$, $E$ contains exactly one of the $(\sum_{1}^{k} α_{i})!$ $\sum_{1}^{k}α_{i}$-tuples whose entries belong to $\cup_{1}^{k}U_{i}^{\prime}$. We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for $k$ lists of non-negative integers in non-decreasing order to be the losing score lists and to be the score lists of some $k$-partite hypertournament.

preprint2010arXiv

Testing of sequences by simulation

Let $ξ$ be a random integer vector, having uniform distribution \[\mathbf{P} \{ξ= (i_1,i_2,...,i_n) = 1/n^n \} \ \hbox{for} \ 1 \leq i_1,i_2,...,i_n\leq n.\] A realization $(i_1,i_2,...,i_n)$ of $ξ$ is called \textit{good}, if its elements are different. We present algorithms \textsc{Linear}, \textsc{Backward}, \textsc{Forward}, \textsc{Tree}, \textsc{Garbage}, \textsc{Bucket} which decide whether a given realization is good. We analyse the number of comparisons and running time of these algorithms using simulation gathering data on all possible inputs for small values of $n$ and generating random inputs for large values of $n$.