Researcher profile

Anna Engelmann

Anna Engelmann contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Simple Reliability Analysis of Complex Service Function Chains (SFCs)

In the framework of Network Function Virtualization (NFV), the reliability of Service Function Chain (SFC), -- an end-to-end service is presented by a chain of virtual network functions (VNFs), is a complex function of placement, configuration and deployment requirements, both in hardware and software. Previous reliability analysis models cannot be directly applied to SFC because they do not consider aspects of system component sharing, heterogeneity of system components and their interdependency in case of failures. In this paper, we analyze service reliability of complex SFC configurations, including serial and parallel VNF chaining, as well as their related backup protection components. Our analysis is based on combinatorial analysis and a reduced binomial theorem, and this simple approach can be utilized to analyzing rather complex SFC configurations. We consider, for the first time, failure dependences among VNF components placed in data centers, racks, and servers. We show that our analysis can easily consider different VNF placement strategies in data center networks in arbitrary configurations and, thus, be effectively used for optimizations of the reliable SFC placement.

preprint2016arXiv

DiffFlow: Differentiating Short and Long Flows for Load Balancing in Data Center Networks

In current Data Center Networks (DCNs), Equal- Cost MultiPath (ECMP) is used as the de-facto routing protocol. However, ECMP does not differentiate between short and long flows, the two main categories of flows depending on their duration (lifetime). This issue causes hot-spots in the network, affecting negatively the Flow Completion Time (FCT) and the throughput, the two key performance metrics in data center networks. Previous work on load balancing proposed solutions such as splitting long flows into short flows, using per-packet forwarding approaches, and isolating the paths of short and long flows. We propose DiffFlow, a new load balancing solution which detects long flows and forwards packets using Random Packet Spraying (RPS) with help of SDN, whereas the flows with small duration are forwarded with ECMP by default. The use of ECMP for short flows is reasonable, as it does not create the out-of-order problem; at the same time, RPS for long flows can efficiently help to load balancing the entire network, given that long flows represent most of the traffic in DCNs. The results show that our DiffFlow solution outperforms both the individual usage of either RPS or ECMP, while the overall throughput achieved is maintained at the level comparable to RPS.