BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Angelika Adensamer

Angelika Adensamer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cs.CYArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

"Computer Says No": Algorithmic Decision Support and Organisational Responsibility

Algorithmic decision support is increasingly used in a whole array of different contexts and structures in various areas of society, influencing many people's lives. Its use raises questions, among others, about accountability, transparency and responsibility. While there is substantial research on the issue of algorithmic systems and responsibility in general, there is little to no prior research on organisational responsibility and its attribution. Our article aims to fill that gap; we give a brief overview of the central issues connected to ADS, responsibility and decision-making in organisational contexts and identify open questions and research gaps. Furthermore, we describe a set of guidelines and a complementary digital tool to assist practitioners in mapping responsibility when introducing ADS within their organisational context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Wer ist schuld, wenn Algorithmen irren? Entscheidungsautomatisierung, Organisationen und Verantwortung

Algorithmic decision support (ADS) is increasingly used in a whole array of different contexts and structures in various areas of society, influencing many people's lives. Its use raises questions, among others, about accountability, transparency and responsibility. Our article aims to give a brief overview of the central issues connected to ADS, responsibility and decision-making in organisational contexts and identify open questions and research gaps. Furthermore, we describe a set of guidelines and a complementary digital tool to assist practitioners in mapping responsibility when introducing ADS within their organisational context. -- Algorithmenunterstützte Entscheidungsfindung (algorithmic decision support, ADS) kommt in verschiedenen Kontexten und Strukturen vermehrt zum Einsatz und beeinflusst in diversen gesellschaftlichen Bereichen das Leben vieler Menschen. Ihr Einsatz wirft einige Fragen auf, unter anderem zu den Themen Rechenschaft, Transparenz und Verantwortung. Im Folgenden möchten wir einen Überblick über die wichtigsten Fragestellungen rund um ADS, Verantwortung und Entscheidungsfindung in organisationalen Kontexten geben und einige offene Fragen und Forschungslücken aufzeigen. Weiters beschreiben wir als konkrete Hilfestellung für die Praxis einen von uns entwickelten Leitfaden samt ergänzendem digitalem Tool, welches Anwender:innen insbesondere bei der Verortung und Zuordnung von Verantwortung bei der Nutzung von ADS in organisationalen Kontexten helfen soll.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

"Part Man, Part Machine, All Cop": Automation in Policing

Digitisation, automation and datafication permeate policing and justice more and more each year -- from predictive policing methods through recidivism prediction to automated biometric identification at the border. The sociotechnical issues surrounding the use of such systems raise questions and reveal problems, both old and new. Our article reviews contemporary issues surrounding automation in policing and the legal system, finds common issues and themes in various different examples, introduces the distinction between human "retail bias" and algorithmic "wholesale bias", and argues for shifting the viewpoint on the debate to focus on both workers' rights and organisational responsibility as well as fundamental rights and the right to an effective remedy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Ich weiß, was du nächsten Sommer getan haben wirst: Predictive Policing in Österreich

Predictive policing is a data-based, predictive analytical technique used in law enforcement. In this paper, we give an overview of the current situation in Austria and discuss technical, sociopolitical and legal questions raised by the use of PP, such as the lack of awareness of discriminatory structures in society, the biases in data underlying PP and the lack of reflection on the basic premises and feedback mechanisms of PP. Violations of fundamental rights without cause are not allowed by the Austrian Code of Criminal Procedure (Strafprozeßordnung, StPO), the Security Police Act (Sicherheitspolizeigesetz, SPG) or the Act concerning Police Protection of the State (Polizeiliches Staatsschutzgesetz, PStSG); the principle of allowing police intervention only on the basis of concrete threats or suspicion must remain absolute. Considering the numerous problems (not least from the point of view of legal policy), we conclude that the use of PP should be eschewed and that resources and planning should instead be focussed on solving the social problems which actually cause crime. ----- Predictive Policing ist ein datenbasiertes und prognosegetriebenes Modell für Polizeiarbeit. Wir geben in diesem Artikel einen Überblick über den aktuellen Stand in Österreich und diskutieren technische, politisch-gesellschaftliche und rechtliche Probleme, die sich daraus ergeben -- etwa das mangelhafte Bewusstsein für Prozesse gesellschaftlicher Diskriminierung, die verzerrte Datenbasis, die PP zugrundeliegt, und fehlende Reflexion über zugrundeliegende Annahmen und Rückkopplungseffekte. Anlasslose Grundrechtseingriffe sind weder durch die StPO noch das SPG oder das PStSG gedeckt; dem Grundgedanken, dass Polizei erst bei konkreter Gefahrenlage oder Tatverdacht tätig werden darf, muss weiterhin Rechnung getragen werden. Aus unserer Sicht sollte angesichts der zahlreichen Probleme (und auch aus rechtspolitischen Erwägungen) auf PP verzichtet werden und stattdessen Ressourcen und Überlegung in die Lösung jener gesellschaftlicher Probleme investiert werden, die zu Kriminalität führen.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access