Source author record

Andrzej Rosłanowski

Andrzej Rosłanowski appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint1996arXiv

Ideals without ccc

Let I be an ideal of subsets of a Polish space X, containing all singletons and possessing a Borel basis. Assuming that I does not satisfy ccc, we consider the following conditions (B), (M) and (D). Condition (B) states that there is a disjoint family F subseteq P(X) of size c, consisting of Borel sets which are not in I. Condition (M) states that there is a function f:X-> X with f^{-1}[{x}] notin I for each x in X. Provided that X is a group and I is invariant, condition (D) states that there exist a Borel set B notin I and a perfect set P subseteq X for which the family {B+x: x in P} is disjoint. The aim of the paper is to study whether the reverse implications in the chain (D) => (M) => (B) => not-ccc can hold. We build a sigma-ideal on the Cantor group witnessing''(M) and not (D)'' (Section 2). A modified version of that sigma-ideal contains the whole space (Section 3). Some consistency results deriving (M) from (B) for''nicely'' defined ideals are established (Section 4). We show that both ccc and (M) can fail (Theorems 1.3 and 4.2). Finally, some sharp versions of (M) for invariant ideals on Polish groups are investigated (Section 5).

preprint1995arXiv

Localizations of infinite subsets of omega

In the present paper we are interested in properties of forcing notions which measure in a sense the distance between the ground model reals and the reals in the extension. We look at the ways the ``new'' reals can be aproximated by ``old'' reals. We consider localizations for infinite subsets of omega. Though each member of [omega]^omega can be identified with its increasing enumeration, the (standard) localizations of the enumeration does not provide satisfactory information on successive points of the set. They give us ``candidates'' for the n-th point of the set but the same candidates can appear several times for distinct n. That led to a suggestion that we should consider disjoint subsets of omega as sets of ``candidates'' for successive points of the localized set. We have two possibilities. Either we can demand that each set from the localization contains a limited number of members of the localized set or we can postulate that each intersection of that kind is large. Localizations of this kind are studied in section 1. In the second section we investigate localizations of infinite subsets of omega by sets of integers from the ground model. These localizations might be thought as localizations by partitions of omega into successive intervals.

preprint1993arXiv

Examples for Souslin forcing

We give a model where there is a ccc Souslin forcing which does not satisfy the Knaster condition. Next, we present a model where there is a sigma-linked not sigma-centered Souslin forcing such that all its small subsets are sigma-centered but Martin Axiom fails for this order. Furthermore, we construct a totally nonhomogeneous Souslin forcing and we build a Souslin forcing which is proper but not ccc that does not contain a perfect set of mutually incompatible conditions. Finally we show that ccc Sigma^1_2-notions of forcing may not be indestructible ccc.