Source author record

Andrzej Herdegen

Andrzej Herdegen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Almost radial gauge

An almost radial gauge $A^\mathrm{ar}$ of the electromagnetic potential is constructed for which $x\cdot A^\mathrm{ar}(x)$ vanishes arbitrarily fast in timelike directions. This potential is in the class introduced by Dirac with the purpose of forming gauge-invariant quantities in quantum electrodynamics. In quantum case the construction of smeared operators $A^\mathrm{ar}(K)$ is enabled by a natural extension of the free electromagnetic field algebra introduced earlier (represented in a Hilbert space). The space of possible smearing functions $K$ includes vector fields with the asymptotic spacetime behavior typical for scattered currents (the conservation condition in the whole spacetime need not be assumed). This construction is motivated by a possible application to the infrared problem in QED.

preprint2022arXiv

Remarks on mathematical structure of the Staruszkiewicz theory

The purpose of this note is threefold: (i) to recall (with some points made more explicit) the mathematical Weyl algebra model formulation, given before, of the Staruszkiewicz theory of quantum Coulomb field; (ii) to add some new elements to the discussion of the representation of the Lorentz group within this model; (iii) to comment on some statements on the structure of the theory which appeared recently.

preprint2015arXiv

Generalized uncertainty relations

The standard uncertainty relations (UR) in quantum mechanics are typically used for unbounded operators (like the canonical pair). This implies the need for the control of the domain problems. On the other hand, the use of (possibly bounded) functions of basic observables usually leads to more complex and less readily interpretable relations. Also, UR may turn trivial for certain states if the commutator of observables is not proportional to a positive operator. In this letter we consider a generalization of standard UR resulting from the use of two, instead of one, vector states. The possibility to link these states to each other in various ways adds additional flexibility to UR, which may compensate some of the above mentioned drawbacks. We discuss applications of the general scheme, leading not only to technical improvements, but also to interesting new insight.

preprint2014arXiv

On energy-momentum transfer of quantum fields

We prove the following theorem on bounded operators in quantum field theory: if $\|[B,B^*(x)]\|\leq \mathrm{const} D(x)$, then $\|B^k_\pm(ν)G(P^0)\|^2\leq\mathrm{const}\int D(x-y)d|ν|(x)d|ν|(y)$, where $D(x)$ is a function weakly decaying in spacelike directions, $B^k_\pm$ are creation/annihilation parts of an appropriate time derivative of $B$, $G$ is any positive, bounded, non-increasing function in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$, and $ν$ is any finite complex Borel measure; creation/annihilation operators may be also replaced by $B^k_t$ with $\check{B^k_t}(p)=|p|^k\check{B}(p)$. We also use the notion of energy-momentum scaling degree of $B$ with respect to a submanifold (Steinmann-type, but in momentum space, and applied to the norm of an operator). These two tools are applied to the analysis of singularities of $\check{B}(p)G(P^0)$. We prove, among others, the following statement (modulo some more specific assumptions): outside $p=0$ the only allowed contributions to this functional which are concentrated on a submanifold (including the trivial one -- a single point) are Dirac measures on hypersurfaces (if the decay of $D$ is not to slow).

preprint2011arXiv

Spacelike localization of long-range fields in a model of asymptotic electrodynamics

A previously proposed algebra of asymptotic fields in quantum electrodynamics is formulated as a net of algebras localized in regions which in general have unbounded spacelike extension. Electromagnetic fields may be localized in `symmetrical spacelike cones', but there are strong indications this is not possible in the present model for charged fields, which have tails extending in all space directions. Nevertheless, products of appropriately `dressed' fermion fields (with compensating charges) yield bi-localized observables.

preprint2010arXiv

Global vs local Casimir effect

This paper continues the investigation of the Casimir effect with the use of the algebraic formulation of quantum field theory in the initial value setting. Basing on earlier papers by one of us (AH) we approximate the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions by simple interaction models whose nonlocality in physical space is under strict control, but which at the same time are admissible from the point of view of algebraic restrictions imposed on models in the context of Casimir backreaction. The geometrical setting is that of the original parallel plates. By scaling our models and taking appropriate limit we approach the sharp boundary conditions in the limit. The global force is analyzed in that limit. One finds in Neumann case that although the sharp boundary interaction is recovered in the norm resolvent sense for each model considered, the total force per area depends substantially on its choice and diverges in the sharp boundary conditions limit. On the other hand the local energy density outside the interaction region, which in the limit includes any compact set outside the strict position of the plates, has a universal limit corresponding to sharp conditions. This is what one should expect in general, and the lack of this discrepancy in Dirichlet case is rather accidental. Our discussion pins down its precise origin: the difference in the order in which scaling limit and integration over the whole space is carried out.