BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andria K. Salas

Andria K. Salas contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Populations and EvolutionMolecular NetworksQuantitative Methods

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

Equivalence of the realized input and output oriented indirect effects metrics in ecological network analysis

A new understanding of the consequences of how ecosystem elements are interconnected is emerging from the development and application of Ecological Network Analysis. The relative importance of indirect effects is central to this understanding, and the ratio of indirect flow to direct flow (I/D) is one indicator of their importance. Two methods have been proposed for calculating this indicator. The unit approach shows what would happen if each system member had a unit input or output, while the realized technique determines the ratio using the observed system inputs or outputs. When using the unit method, the input oriented and output oriented ratios can be different, potentially leading to conflicting results. However, we show that the input and output oriented I/D ratios are identical using the realized method when the system is at steady state. This work is a step in the maturation of Ecological Network Analysis that will let it be more readily testable empirically and ultimately more useful for environmental assessment and management.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Evidence for Resource Homogenization in 50 Trophic Ecosystem Networks

Connectivity patterns of ecological elements are often the core concern of ecologists working at multiple levels of organization (e.g., populations, ecosystems, and landscapes) because these patterns often reflect the forces shaping the system&#39;s development as well as constraining their operation. One reason these patterns of direct connections are critical is that they establish the pathways through which elements influence each other indirectly. Here, we tested a hypothesized consequence of connectivity in ecosystems: the homogenization of resource distributions in flow networks. Specifically, we tested the generality of the systems ecology hypothesis of resource homogenization in 50 empirically derived trophic ecosystem models representing 35 distinct ecosystems. We applied Ecological Network Analysis to calculate resource homogenization for these models. We further evaluated the robustness of our results in two ways. First, we verified the close correspondence between the input- and output-oriented homogenization values to ensure that our results were not biased by our decision to focus on the output orientation. Second, we conducted a Monte Carlo based uncertainty analysis to determine the robustness of our results to +/-5% error introduced into the original flow matrices for each model. Our results show that resource homogenization occurs universally in the 50 ecosystem models tested. We confirm that our results are not biased by using the output-oriented homogenization values because there is a significant linear regression between the input and output oriented homogenization (r^2 = 0.38, p < 0.001). Finally, we found that our results are robust to +/-5% error in the flow matrices. In conclusion, we found strong support for the resource homogenization hypothesis in 50 empirically derived ecosystem models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Evidence for the Dominance of Indirect Effects in 50 Trophically-Based Ecosystem Networks

Indirect effects are powerful influences in ecosystems that may maintain species diversity and alter apparent relationships between species in surprising ways. Here, we applied Network Environ Analysis to 50 empirically-based trophic ecosystem models to test the hypothesis that indirect flows dominate direct flows in ecosystem networks. Further, we used Monte Carlo based perturbations to investigate the robustness of these results to potential error in the underlying data. To explain our findings, we further investigated the importance of the microbial food web in recycling energy-matter using components of the Finn Cycling Index and analysis of Environ Centrality. We found that indirect flows dominate direct flows in 37/50 (74.0%) models. This increases to 31/35 (88.5%) models when we consider only models that have cycling structure and a representation of the microbial food web. The uncertainty analysis reveals that there is less error in the I/D values than the $\pm$ 5% error introduced into the models, suggesting the results are robust to uncertainty. Our results show that the microbial food web mediates a substantial percentage of cycling in some systems (median = 30.2%), but its role is highly variable in these models, in agreement with the literature. Our results, combined with previous work, strongly suggest that indirect effects are dominant components of activity in ecosystems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access