Researcher profile

Andrew W. Woods

Andrew W. Woods contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - Baseline
1works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

CO$_2$ dissolution in a background hydrological flow

We investigate the long time steady-state dissolution of CO$_{2}$ in a deep saline aqquifer in the presence of a background hydrological flow. In steady-state, the distribution of CO$_2$ in the groundwater upstream of the aquifer involves a balance between three competing effects: (i) the buoyancy-driven flow of CO$_2$ saturated water; (ii) the diffusion of CO$_2$ from saturated to under-saturated water; and (iii) the advection associated with the oncoming background flow. This leads to three limiting regimes. In the limit of very slow diffusion, a nearly static intrusion of dense fluid may extend a finite distance upstream, balanced by the pressure gradient associated with the oncoming background flow. In the limit of fast diffusion relative to the flow, a gradient zone may become established in which the along aquifer diffusive flux balances the advection associated with the background flow. However, if the buoyancy-driven flow speed exceeds the background hydrological flow speed, then a third, intermediate regime may become established. In this regime, a convective recirculation develops upstream of the anticline involving the vertical diffusion of CO$_2$ from an upstream propagating flow of dense CO$_2$ saturated water into the downstream propagating flow of CO$_2$ unsaturated water. For each limiting case, we find analytical solutions for the distribution of CO$_2$ upstream of the anticline, and test our analysis with full numerical simulations. A key result is that, although there may be very different controls on the distribution and extent of CO$_2$ bearing water upstream of the anticline, in each case the dissolution rate is given by the product of the background volume flux and the difference in concentration between the CO$_2$ saturated water and the original aquifer water upstream.