BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Andrew Salmon appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We define three-point bounds for sphere packing that refine the linear programming bound, and we compute these bounds numerically using semidefinite programming by choosing a truncation radius for the three-point function. As a result, we obtain new upper bounds on the sphere packing density in dimension 4 through 7 and 9 through 16. We also give a different three-point bound for lattice packing and conjecture that this second bound is sharp in dimension 4.
In 1986, Janson showed that the number of edges in the union of $k$ random spanning trees in the complete graph $K_n$ is a shifted Poisson distribution. Using results from the theory of electrical networks, we provide a new proof of this result, and we obtain an explicit rate of convergence. This rate of convergence allows us to show a new upper tail bound on the number of trees in $G(n,p)$, for $p$ a constant not depending on $n$. The number of edges in the union of $k$ random trees is related to moments of the number of spanning trees in $G(n, p)$. As an application, we prove the law of the iterated logarithm for the number of spanning trees in $G(n,p)$. More precisely, consider the infinite random graph $G(\mathbb{N}, p)$, with vertex set $\mathbb{N}$ and where each edge appears independently with constant probability $p$. By restricting to $\{1, 2, \dotsc, n\}$, we obtain a series of nested Erdös-Réyni random graphs $G(n,p)$. We show that a scaled version of the number of spanning trees satisfies the law of the iterated logarithm.
Let $\mathrm{ch}(G)$ denote the choice number of a graph $G$, and let $K_{s*k}$ be the complete $k$-partite graph with $s$ vertices in each part. Erdős, Rubin, and Taylor showed that $\mathrm{ch}( K_{2*k})=k$, and suggested the problem of determining the choice number of $K_{s*k}.$ The first author established $\mathrm{ch}( K_{3*k})=\left\lceil \frac{4k-1}{3}\right\rceil$. Here we prove $\mathrm{ch} (K_{4*k})=\left\lceil \frac{3k-1}{2}\right\rceil$.