BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andrew Repp

Andrew Repp contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Galaxy Bias and $σ_8$ from Counts in Cells from the SDSS Main Sample

The counts-in-cells (CIC) galaxy probability distribution depends on both the dark matter clustering amplitude $σ_8$ and the galaxy bias $b$. We present a theory for the CIC distribution based on a previous prescription of the underlying dark matter distribution and a linear volume transformation to redshift space. We show that, unlike the power spectrum, the CIC distribution breaks the degeneracy between $σ_8$ and $b$ on scales large enough that both bias and redshift distortions are still linear; thus we obtain a simultaneous fit for both parameters. We first validate the technique on the Millennium Simulation and then apply it to the SDSS Main Galaxy Sample. We find $σ_8 = 0.94^{+.11}_{-.10}$ and $b = 1.36^{+.14}_{-.11}$, consistent with previous complementary results from redshift distortions and from Planck.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

An Ising model for galaxy bias

A reliable model of galaxy bias is necessary for interpreting data from future dense galaxy surveys. Conventional bias models are inaccurate, in that they can yield unphysical results ($δ_g < -1$) for voids that might contain half of the available cosmological information. For this reason, we present a physically-motivated bias model based on an analogy with the Ising model. With only two free parameters, the model produces sensible results for both high- and low-density regions. We also test the model using a catalog of Millennium Simulation galaxies in cubical survey pixels with side lengths from $2h^{-1}$--$31h^{-1}$Mpc, at redshifts from 0 to 2. We find the Ising model markedly superior to linear and quadratic bias models on scales smaller than $10h^{-1}$Mpc, while those conventional models fare better on scales larger than $30h^{-1}$Mpc. While the largest scale where the Ising model is applicable might vary for a specific galaxy catalog, it should be superior on any scale with a non-negligible fraction of cells devoid of galaxies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Hawaii Two-0: High-redshift galaxy clustering and bias

We perform an analysis of two-point galaxy clustering and galaxy bias using Subaru Hyper-Suprime Cam (HSC) data taken jointly by the Subaru Strategic Program and the University of Hawaii in the COSMOS field. The depth of the data is similar to the ongoing Hawaii Two-0 (H20) optical galaxy survey, thus the results are indicative of future constraints from tenfold area. We measure the angular auto-power spectra of the galaxy overdensity in three redshift bins, defined by dropouts from the g-, r- and i-bands, and compare them to the theoretical expectation from concordance cosmology with linear galaxy bias. We determine the redshift distribution of each bin using a standard template-based photometric redshift method, coupled with a self-organizing map (SOM) to quantify colour space coverage. We also investigate sources of systematic errors to inform the methodology and requirements for Hawaii Two-0. The linear galaxy bias fit results are $b_{\mathrm{gal,g}} = 3.90 \pm 0.33 (\mathrm{stat}) \substack{ +0.64 \\ -0.24 } (\mathrm{sys})$ at redshift $z \simeq 3.7$, $b_{\mathrm{gal,r}} = 8.44 \pm 0.63 (\mathrm{stat}) \substack{ +1.42 \\ -0.72 } (\mathrm{sys})$ at $z \simeq 4.7$, and $b_{\mathrm{gal,i}} = 11.94 \pm 2.24 (\mathrm{stat}) \substack{ +1.82 \\ -1.27 } (\mathrm{sys})$ at $z \simeq 5.9$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access