Researcher profile

Andrew Nencka

Andrew Nencka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Optimization of hyperparameters for SMS reconstruction

Simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) imaging accelerates MRI data acquisition by exciting multiple image slices simultaneously. Overlapping slices are then separated using a mathematical model. Several parameters used in SMS reconstruction impact the quality of final images. Therefore, finding an optimal set of reconstruction parameters is critical to ensure that SMS acceleration does not significantly degrade resulting image quality. Gradient-echo echo planar imaging (EPI) data were acquired with a range of SMS acceleration factors from volunteers. Images were collected using two head coils (a 48-channel array and a smaller 32-channel array). Data from these coils were reconstructed offline using a range of coil compression factors and reconstruction kernel parameters. A hybrid space (ky-x), externally-calibrated coil-by-coil slice unaliasing approach was used for image reconstruction. The resulting SMS images were compared with identical EPI data acquired without SMS. A functional MRI (fMRI) experiment was also performed and group analysis results were compared between data sets reconstructed with different coil compression levels. The 32-channel coil with smaller dimensions outperformed the larger 48-channel coil in our experiments. Generally, a large calibration region and small kernel sizes in ky direction improved image quality. Use of regularization in the kernel fitting procedure had a notable impact. With optimal selection of other hyperparameters in the hybrid space SMS unaliasing algorithm, coil compression caused small reduction in quality in SMS accelerated images. Similarly, group analysis of fMRI results did not show a significant influence of coil compression on resulting image quality. Hyperparameters used in SMS reconstruction need to be fine-tuned once the experimental factors such as the RF receive coil and SMS factor have been determined.