BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andrew J. Bordner

Andrew J. Bordner contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
BiomoleculesGenomicshep-thPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

A new formulation of protein evolutionary models that account for structural constraints

Despite the importance of a thermodynamically stable structure with a conserved fold for protein function, almost all evolutionary models neglect site-site correlations that arise from physical interactions between neighboring amino acid sites. This is mainly due to the difficulty in formulating a computationally tractable model since rate matrices can no longer be used. Here we introduce a general framework, based on factor graphs, for constructing probabilistic models of protein evolution with site interdependence. Conveniently, efficient approximate inference algorithms, like Belief Propagation, can be used to calculate likelihoods for these models. We fit an amino acid substitution model of this type that accounts for both solvent accessibility and site-site correlations. Comparisons of the new model with rate matrix models and a model accounting only for solvent accessibility demonstrate that it better fits the sequence data. We also examine evolution within a family of homohexameric enzymes and find that site-site correlations between most contacting subunits contribute to a higher likelihood. In addition, we show that the new substitution model has a similar mathematical form to the one introduced in (Rodrigue et al. 2005), although with different parameter interpretations and values. We also perform a statistical analysis of the effects of amino acids at neighboring sites on substitution probabilities and find a significant perturbation of most probabilities, further supporting the significant role of site-site interactions in protein evolution and motivating the development of new evolutionary models like the one described here. Finally, we discuss possible extensions and applications of the new substitution models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Predicting non-neutral missense mutations and their biochemical consequences using genome-scale homology modeling of human protein complexes

Computational methods are needed to differentiate the small fraction of missense mutations that contribute to disease by disrupting protein function from neutral variants. We describe several complementary methods using large-scale homology modeling of human protein complexes to detect non-neutral mutations. Importantly, unlike sequence conservation-based methods, this structure-based approach provides experimentally testable biochemical mechanisms for mutations in disease. Specifically, we infer metal ion, small molecule, protein-protein, and nucleic acid binding sites by homology and find that disease-associated missense mutations are more prevalent in each class of binding site than are neutral mutations. Importantly, our approach identifies considerably more binding sites than those annotated in the RefSeq database. Furthermore, an analysis of metal ion and protein-protein binding sites predicted by machine learning shows a similar preponderance of disease-associated mutations in these sites. We also derive a statistical score for predicting how mutations affect metal ion binding and find many dbSNP mutations that likely disrupt ion binding but were not previously considered deleterious. We also cluster mutations in the protein structure to discover putative functional regions. Finally, we develop a machine learning predictor for detecting disease-associated missense mutations and show that it outperforms two other prediction methods on an independent test set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1993arXiv

Phase Space Reduction and Vortex Statistics: An Anyon Quantization Ambiguity

We examine the quantization of the motion of two charged vortices in a Ginzburg--Landau theory for the fractional quantum Hall effect recently proposed by the first two authors. The system has two second-class constraints which can be implemented either in the reduced phase space or Dirac-Gupta-Bleuler formalism. Using the intrinsic formulation of statistics, we show that these two ways of implementing the constraints are inequivalent unless the vortices are quantized with conventional statistics; either fermionic or bosonic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access