Source author record

Andrew Harms

Andrew Harms appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Identification of Linear Time-Varying Systems Through Waveform Diversity

Linear, time-varying (LTV) systems composed of time shifts, frequency shifts, and complex amplitude scalings are operators that act on continuous finite-energy waveforms. This paper presents a novel, resource-efficient method for identifying the parametric description of such systems, i.e., the time shifts, frequency shifts, and scalings, from the sampled response to linear frequency modulated (LFM) waveforms, with emphasis on the application to radar processing. If the LTV operator is probed with a sufficiently diverse set of LFM waveforms, then the system can be identified with high accuracy. In the case of noiseless measurements, the identification is perfect, while in the case of noisy measurements, the accuracy is inversely proportional to the noise level. The use of parametric estimation techniques with recently proposed denoising algorithms allows the estimation of the parameters with high accuracy.

preprint2013arXiv

Finding Zeros: Greedy Detection of Holes

In this paper, motivated by the setting of white-space detection [1], we present theoretical and empirical results for detection of the zero-support E of x \in Cp (xi = 0 for i \in E) with reduced-dimension linear measurements. We propose two low- complexity algorithms based on one-step thresholding [2] for this purpose. The second algorithm is a variant of the first that further assumes the presence of group-structure in the target signal [3] x. Performance guarantees for both algorithms based on the worst- case and average coherence (group coherence) of the measurement matrix is presented along with the empirical performance of the algorithms.