Researcher profile

Andrew C. Murphy

Andrew C. Murphy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A structurally informed model for modulating functional connectivity

Functional connectivity (FC) between brain regions tracks symptom severity in many neuropsychiatric disorders. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) directly alters regional activity and indirectly alters FC. Predicting how FC will change following TMS is difficult, but would allow novel therapies that target FC to improve symptoms. We address this challenge by proposing a predictive model that explains how TMS-induced activation can change the strength of FC. Here, we focus on the FC of the frontoparietal (FPS) and default mode (DMS) systems given the importance of their FC in executive function and affective disorders. We fit this model to neuroimaging data in 29 individuals who received TMS to the frontal cortex and evaluated the FC between the FPS and DMS. For each individual, we measured the TMS-induced change in FC between the FPS and DMS (the FC network), and the structural coupling between the stimulated area and the FPS and DMS (the structural context network (SCN)). We find that TMS-induced FC changes are best predicted when the model accounts for white matter fibers from the stimulated area to the two systems. We find that the correlation between these two networks (structure-function coupling) - and therefore the predictability of the TMS-induced modulation - was highest when the SCN contained a dense core of intraconnected regions, indicating that the stimulated area had ample access to an anatomical module. Further, we found that when the core of the SCN overlapped with the FPS and DMS, we observed the greatest change in the strength of their FC. Broadly, our findings explain how the structural connectivity of a stimulated region modulates TMS-induced changes in the brain's functional network. Efforts to account for such structural connections could improve predictions of TMS response, further informing the development of TMS protocols for clinical translation.

preprint2019arXiv

Multiscale and multimodal network dynamics underpinning working memory

Working memory (WM) allows information to be stored and manipulated over short time scales. Performance on WM tasks is thought to be supported by the frontoparietal system (FPS), the default mode system (DMS), and interactions between them. Yet little is known about how these systems and their interactions relate to individual differences in WM performance. We address this gap in knowledge using functional MRI data acquired during the performance of a 2-back WM task, as well as diffusion tensor imaging data collected in the same individuals. We show that the strength of functional interactions between the FPS and DMS during task engagement is inversely correlated with WM performance, and that this strength is modulated by the activation of FPS regions but not DMS regions. Next, we use a clustering algorithm to identify two distinct subnetworks of the FPS, and find that these subnetworks display distinguishable patterns of gene expression. Activity in one subnetwork is positively associated with the strength of FPS-DMS functional interactions, while activity in the second subnetwork is negatively associated. Further, the pattern of structural linkages of these subnetworks explains their differential capacity to influence the strength of FPS-DMS functional interactions. To determine whether these observations could provide a mechanistic account of large-scale neural underpinnings of WM, we build a computational model of the system composed of coupled oscillators. Modulating the amplitude of the subnetworks in the model causes the expected change in the strength of FPS-DMS functional interactions, thereby offering support for a mechanism in which subnetwork activity tunes functional interactions. Broadly, our study presents a holistic account of how regional activity, functional interactions, and structural linkages together support individual differences in WM in humans.