BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
We consider various problems related to finding points in $\Q^{2}$ and in $\Q^{3}$ which lie at rational distance from the vertices of some specified geometric object, for example, a square or rectangle in $\Q^{2}$, and a cube or tetrahedron in $\Q^{3}$.
Euler showed that there can be no more than three integer squares in arithmetic progression. In quadratic number fields, Xarles has shown that there can be arithmetic progressions of five squares, but not of six. Here, we prove that there are no cubic number fields which contain five squares in arithmetic progression.
In this note we construct several infinite families of diagonal quartic surfaces \begin{equation*} ax^4+by^4+cz^4+dw^4=0, \end{equation*} where a,b,c,d∈Z∖{0} with infinitely many rational points and satisfying the condition abcd=□. In particular, we present an infinite family of diagonal quartic surfaces defined over $\Q$ with Picard number equal to one and possessing infinitely many rational points. Further, we present some sextic surfaces of type ax6+by6+cz6+dwi=0, i=2, 3, or 6, with infinitely many rational points.
In this note we consider Diophantine equations of the form \begin{equation*} a(x^p-y^q) = b(z^r-w^s), \quad \mbox{where}\quad \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s}=1, \end{equation*} with even positive integers p,q,r,s. We show that in each case the set of rational points on the underlying surface is dense in the Zariski topology. For the surface with (p,q,r,s)=(2,6,6,6) we prove density of rational points in the Euclidean topology. Moreover, in this case we construct infinitely many parametric solutions in coprime polynomials. The same result is true for (p,q,r,s)∈{(2,4,8,8),(2,8,4,8)}. In the case (p,q,r,s)=(4,4,4,4), we present some new parametric solutions of the equation x4−y4=4(z4−w4).
In a recent paper \cite{Jan}, Jankauskas proved some interesting results concerning the reducibility of quadrinomials of the form f(4,x), where f(a,x)=xn+xm+xk+a. He also obtained some examples of reducible quadrinomials f(a,x) with a∈Z, such that all the irreducible factors of f(a,x) are of degree ≥3. In this paper we perform a more systematic approach to the problem and ask about reducibility of f(a,x) with $a\in\Q$. In particular by computing the set of rational points on some genus two curves we characterize in several cases all quadrinomials f(a,x) with degree ≤6 and divisible by a quadratic polynomial. We also give further examples of reducible f(a,x), $a\in\Q$, such that all irreducible factors are of degree ≥3.
Say a trinomial $x^n+A x^m+B \in \Q[x]$ has reducibility type (n1,n2,...,nk) if there exists a factorization of the trinomial into irreducible polynomials in $\Q[x]$ of degrees n1, n2,...,nk, ordered so that n1≤n2≤...≤nk. Specifying the reducibility type of a monic polynomial of fixed degree is equivalent to specifying rational points on an algebraic curve. When the genus of this curve is 0 or 1, there is reasonable hope that all its rational points may be described; and techniques are available that may also find all points when the genus is 2. Thus all corresponding reducibility types may be described. These low genus instances are the ones studied in this paper.
We find explicitly all rational solutions of the title equation for all integers k in the range ∣k∣≤50 except for k=−47,−39. For the solution, a variety of methods is applied, which, depending on k, may range from elementary, such as divisibility and congruence considerations, to elliptic Chabauty techniques and highly technical computations in algebraic number fields, or a combination thereof. For certain sets of values of k we can propose a more or less uniform method of solution, which might be applied successfully for quite a number of cases of k, even beyond the above range. It turns out, however, that in the range considered, six really challenging cases have to be dealt with individually, namely k=15,43,−11,−15,−39,−47. More than half of the paper is devoted to the solution of the title equation for the first four of these values. For the last two values the solution of the equation, at present, has resisted all our efforts. The case with these six values of k shows that one cannot expect a general method of solution which could be applied, even in principle, for {\em every} value of k. A summary of our results is shown at the end of the paper.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.