Researcher profile

Andreas Malcher

Andreas Malcher contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Reversible Computations of One-Way Counter Automata

Deterministic one-way time-bounded multi-counter automata are studied with respect to their ability to perform reversible computations, which means that the automata are also backward deterministic and, thus, are able to uniquely step the computation back and forth. We study the computational capacity of such devices and obtain separation results between irreversible and reversible k-counter automata for superpolynomial time. For exponential time we obtain moreover an infinite and tight hierarchy with respect to the number of counters. This hierarchy is shown with Kolmogorov complexity and incompressibility arguments. In this way, on passing we can prove this hierarchy also for ordinary counter automata. This improves the known hierarchy for ordinary counter automata in the sense that here we consider a weaker acceptance condition. Then, it turns out that k+1 reversible counters are not better than k ordinary counters and vice versa. Finally, almost all usually studied decidability questions turn out to be undecidable and not even semidecidable for reversible multi-counter automata, if at least two counters are provided.

preprint2014arXiv

Measuring Communication in Parallel Communicating Finite Automata

Systems of deterministic finite automata communicating by sending their states upon request are investigated, when the amount of communication is restricted. The computational power and decidability properties are studied for the case of returning centralized systems, when the number of necessary communications during the computations of the system is bounded by a function depending on the length of the input. It is proved that an infinite hierarchy of language families exists, depending on the number of messages sent during their most economical recognitions. Moreover, several properties are shown to be not semi-decidable for the systems under consideration.

preprint2012arXiv

Transductions Computed by One-Dimensional Cellular Automata

Cellular automata are investigated towards their ability to compute transductions, that is, to transform inputs into outputs. The families of transductions computed are classified with regard to the time allowed to process the input and to compute the output. Since there is a particular interest in fast transductions, we mainly focus on the time complexities real time and linear time. We first investigate the computational capabilities of cellular automaton transducers by comparing them to iterative array transducers, that is, we compare parallel input/output mode to sequential input/output mode of massively parallel machines. By direct simulations, it turns out that the parallel mode is not weaker than the sequential one. Moreover, with regard to certain time complexities cellular automaton transducers are even more powerful than iterative arrays. In the second part of the paper, the model in question is compared with the sequential devices single-valued finite state transducers and deterministic pushdown transducers. It turns out that both models can be simulated by cellular automaton transducers faster than by iterative array transducers.

preprint2010arXiv

Remembering Chandra Kintala

With this contribution we would like to remember Chandra M. R. Kintala who passed away in November 2009. We will give short overviews of his CV and his contributions to the field of theoretical and applied computer science and, given the opportunity, will attempt to present the current state of limited nondeterminism and limited resources for machines. Finally, we will briefly touch on some research topics which hopefully will be addressed in the not so distant future.