Comparison of BMA and EMOS statistical calibration methods for temperature and wind speed ensemble weather prediction
The evolution of the weather can be described by deterministic numerical weather forecasting models. Multiple runs of these models with different initial conditions and/or model physics result in forecast ensembles which are used for estimating the distribution of future atmospheric variables. However, these ensembles are usually under-dispersive and uncalibrated, so post-processing is required. In the present work we compare different versions of Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) post-processing methods in order to calibrate 2m temperature and 10m wind speed forecasts of the operational ALADIN Limited Area Model Ensemble Prediction System of the Hungarian Meteorological Service. We show that compared to the raw ensemble both post-processing methods improve the calibration of probabilistic and accuracy of point forecasts and that the best BMA method slightly outperforms the EMOS technique.