Researcher profile

Anastasia Shuba

Anastasia Shuba contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Exposures Exposed: A Measurement and User Study to Assess Mobile Data Privacy in Context

Mobile devices have access to personal, potentially sensitive data, and there is a large number of mobile applications and third-party libraries that transmit this information over the network to remote servers (including app developer servers and third party servers). In this paper, we are interested in better understanding of not just the extent of personally identifiable information (PII) exposure, but also its context i.e., functionality of the app, destination server, encryption used, etc.) and the risk perceived by mobile users today. To that end we take two steps. First, we perform a measurement study: we collect a new dataset via manual and automatic testing and capture the exposure of 16 PII types from 400 most popular Android apps. We analyze these exposures and provide insights into the extent and patterns of mobile apps sharing PII, which can be later used for prediction and prevention. Second, we perform a user study with 220 participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk: we summarize the results of the measurement study in categories, present them in a realistic context, and assess users' understanding, concern, and willingness to take action. To the best of our knowledge, our user study is the first to collect and analyze user input in such fine granularity and on actual (not just potential or permitted) privacy exposures on mobile devices. Although many users did not initially understand the full implications of their PII being exposed, after being better informed through the study, they became appreciative and interested in better privacy practices.

preprint2022arXiv

Goodbye Tracking? Impact of iOS App Tracking Transparency and Privacy Labels

Tracking is a highly privacy-invasive data collection practice that has been ubiquitous in mobile apps for many years due to its role in supporting advertising-based revenue models. In response, Apple introduced two significant changes with iOS 14: App Tracking Transparency (ATT), a mandatory opt-in system for enabling tracking on iOS, and Privacy Nutrition Labels, which disclose what kinds of data each app processes. So far, the impact of these changes on individual privacy and control has not been well understood. This paper addresses this gap by analysing two versions of 1,759 iOS apps from the UK App Store: one version from before iOS 14 and one that has been updated to comply with the new rules. We find that Apple's new policies, as promised, prevent the collection of the Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA), an identifier for cross-app tracking. Smaller data brokers that engage in invasive data practices will now face higher challenges in tracking users - a positive development for privacy. However, the number of tracking libraries has roughly stayed the same in the studied apps. Many apps still collect device information that can be used to track users at a group level (cohort tracking) or identify individuals probabilistically (fingerprinting). We find real-world evidence of apps computing and agreeing on a fingerprinting-derived identifier through the use of server-side code, thereby violating Apple's policies. We find that Apple itself engages in some forms of tracking and exempts invasive data practices like first-party tracking and credit scoring. We also find that the new Privacy Nutrition Labels are sometimes inaccurate and misleading. Overall, our findings suggest that, while tracking individual users is more difficult now, the changes reinforce existing market power of gatekeeper companies with access to large troves of first-party data and motivate a countermovement.