BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ananda G. Maity

Ananda G. Maity contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
quant-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Robust certification of arbitrary outcome quantum measurements from temporal correlations

Certification of quantum devices received from unknown providers is a primary requirement before utilizing the devices for any information processing task. Here, we establish a protocol for certification of a particular set of $d$-outcome quantum measurements (with $d$ being arbitrary) in a setup comprising of a preparation followed by two measurements in sequence. We propose a set of temporal inequalities pertaining to different $d$ involving correlation functions corresponding to successive measurement outcomes, that are not satisfied by quantum devices. Using quantum violations of these inequalities, we certify specific $d$-outcome quantum measurements under some minimal assumptions which can be met in an experiment efficiently. Our certification protocol neither requires entanglement, nor any prior knowledge about the dimension of the system under consideration. We further show that our protocol is robust against practical non-ideal realizations. Finally, as an offshoot of our protocol, we present a scheme for secure certification of genuine quantum randomness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Genuine Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering of three-qubit states by multiple sequential observers

We investigate the possibility of multiple use of a single copy of three-qubit states for genuine tripartite Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering. A pure three-qubit state of either the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ)-type or W-type is shared between two fixed observers in two wings and a sequence of multiple observers in the third wing who perform unsharp or non-projective measurements. The choice of measurement settings for each of the multiple observers in the third wing is independent and uncorrelated with the measurement settings and outcomes of the previous observers. We investigate all possible types of (2->1) and (1->2) genuine tripartite steering in the above set-up. For each case, we obtain an upper limit on the number of observers on the third wing who can demonstrate genuine EPR steering through violation of a tripartite steering inequality. We show that the GHZ state allows for a higher number of observers compared to that for W state. Additionally, (1->2) steering is possible for a larger range of the sharpness parameter compared to that for the (2->1) steering cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Detecting non-Markovianity via uncertainty relations

We present a formalism for detection of non-Markovianity through uncertainty relations. We show that when there is an information back-flow to the system from its environment through CP-divisibility breaking, the Choi-states corresponding to the reduced system evolution contain at least one negative eigenvalue. The consequent break down of uncertainty relations for such states can be used to witness non-Markovian dynamics. We present some relevant examples of the phenomenon for qubit channels. We further prove that square of the variance of a suitable hermitian operator can act as a non-linear witness of non-Markovianity. We finally show that non-Markovianity is necessary in order to decrease the uncertainty of the states undergoing unital dynamics for qubits. This provides another method of certifying non-Markovianity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Detection of genuine tripartite entanglement by multiple sequential observers

Due to the difficulties present in experimentally preparing genuine tripartite entanglement, it is important to explore the possibility of multiple usage of a single genuine entangled state. In the present paper, we present one such possibility by considering a scenario consisting of three spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ particles shared between Alice, Bob and multiple Charlies. Alice performs measurements on the first particle, Bob performs measurements on the second particle and multiple Charlies perform measurements on the third particle sequentially and independently. In this scenario, we investigate whether more than one Charlie can detect genuine tripartite entanglement, and we answer this question affirmatively. In order to probe genuine entanglement, we use correlation inequalities whose violations certify genuine tripartite entanglement in a device-independent way. We extend our investigation by using appropriate genuine tripartite entanglement witness operators. Using each of these different tools for detecting genuine tripartite entanglement, we find out the maximum number of Charlies who can detect genuine entanglement in the above scenario.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access