BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Anamika Chhabra

Anamika Chhabra contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cs.CYHuman-Computer Interaction

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Ideal Composition of a Group for Maximal Knowledge Building in Crowdsourced Environments

Crowdsourcing has revolutionized the process of knowledge building on the web. Wikipedia and StackOverflow are witness to this uprising development. However, the dynamics behind the process of crowdsourcing in the domain of knowledge building is an area relatively unexplored. It has been observed that an ecosystem exists in the collaborative knowledge building environments (KBE), which puts users of a KBE into various categories based on their expertise. Classical cognitive theories indicate triggering among the knowledge units to be one of the most important reasons behind accelerated knowledge building in collaborative KBEs. We use the concept of ecosystem and the triggering phenomenon to highlight the necessity for the right mix of users in a KBE. We provide a hill climbing based algorithm which gives the ideal mixture of users in a KBE, given the amount of triggering that takes place among the users of various categories. The study will help the portal designers to accordingly build suitable crowdsourced environments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Framework for Textbook Enhancement and Learning using Crowdsourced Annotations

Despite a significant improvement in the educational aids in terms of effective teaching-learning process, most of the educational content available to the students is less than optimal in the context of being up-to-date, exhaustive and easy-to-understand. There is a need to iteratively improve the educational material based on the feedback collected from the students' learning experience. This can be achieved by observing the students' interactions with the content, and then having the authors modify it based on this feedback. Hence, we aim to facilitate and promote communication between the communities of authors, instructors and students in order to gradually improve the educational material. Such a system will also help in students' learning process by encouraging student-to-student teaching. Underpinning these objectives, we provide the framework of a platform named Crowdsourced Annotation System (CAS) where the people from these communities can collaborate and benefit from each other. We use the concept of in-context annotations, through which, the students can add their comments about the given text while learning it. An experiment was conducted on 60 students who try to learn an article of a textbook by annotating it for four days. According to the result of the experiment, most of the students were highly satisfied with the use of CAS. They stated that the system is extremely useful for learning and they would like to use it for learning other concepts in future.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Ecosystem: A Characteristic Of Crowdsourced Environments

The phenomenal success of certain crowdsourced online platforms, such as Wikipedia, is accredited to their ability to tap the crowd's potential to collaboratively build knowledge. While it is well known that the crowd's collective wisdom surpasses the cumulative individual expertise, little is understood on the dynamics of knowledge building in a crowdsourced environment. A proper understanding of the dynamics of knowledge building in a crowdsourced environment would enable one in the better designing of such environments to solicit knowledge from the crowd. Our experiment on crowdsourced systems based on annotations shows that an important reason for the rapid knowledge building in such environments is due to variance in expertise. First, we used as our test bed, a customized Crowdsourced Annotation System (CAS) which provides a group of users the facility to annotate a given document while trying to understand it. Our results showed the presence of different genres of proficiency amongst the users of an annotation system. We observed that the ecosystem in crowdsourced annotation system comprised of mainly four categories of contributors, namely: Probers, Solvers, Articulators and Explorers. We inferred from our experiment that the knowledge garnering mainly happens due to the synergetic interaction across these categories. Further, we conducted an analysis on the dataset of Wikipedia and Stack Overflow and noticed the ecosystem presence in these portals as well. From this study, we claim that the ecosystem is a universal characteristic of all crowdsourced portals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access