Researcher profile

Ana-Maria Olteanu

Ana-Maria Olteanu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Chatty Mobiles:Individual mobility and communication patterns

Human mobility analysis is an important issue in social sciences, and mobility data are among the most sought-after sources of information in ur- Data ban studies, geography, transportation and territory management. In network sciences mobility studies have become popular in the past few years, especially using mobile phone location data. For preserving the customer privacy, datasets furnished by telecom operators are anonymized. At the same time, the large size of datasets often makes the task of calculating all observed trajectories very difficult and time-consuming. One solution could be to sample users. However, the fact of not having information about the mobile user makes the sampling delicate. Some researchers select randomly a sample of users from their dataset. Others try to optimize this method, for example, taking into account only users with a certain number or frequency of locations recorded. At the first glance, the second choice seems to be more efficient: having more individual traces makes the analysis more precise. However, the most frequently used CDR data (Call Detail Records) have location generated only at the moment of communication (call, SMS, data connection). Due to this fact, users mobility patterns cannot be precisely built upon their communication patterns. Hence, these data have evident short-comings both in terms of spatial and temporal scale. In this paper we propose to estimate the correlation between the users communication and mo- bility in order to better assess the bias of frequency based sampling. Using technical GSM network data (including communication but also independent mobility records), we will analyze the relationship between communication and mobility patterns.