BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Amin Saberi

Amin Saberi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and Algorithmsmath.PRComputer Science and Game Theoryecon.TH

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Beating Greedy Matching in Sublinear Time

We study sublinear time algorithms for estimating the size of maximum matching in graphs. Our main result is a $(\frac{1}{2}+Ω(1))$-approximation algorithm which can be implemented in $O(n^{1+ε})$ time, where $n$ is the number of vertices and the constant $ε> 0$ can be made arbitrarily small. The best known lower bound for the problem is $Ω(n)$, which holds for any constant approximation. Existing algorithms either obtain the greedy bound of $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation [Behnezhad FOCS'21], or require some assumption on the maximum degree to run in $o(n^2)$-time [Yoshida, Yamamoto, and Ito STOC'09]. We improve over these by designing a less "adaptive" augmentation algorithm for maximum matching that might be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Improved Online Contention Resolution for Matchings and Applications to the Gig Economy

Motivated by applications in the gig economy, we study approximation algorithms for a \emph{sequential pricing problem}. The input is a bipartite graph $G=(I,J,E)$ between individuals $I$ and jobs $J$. The platform has a value of $v_j$ for matching job $j$ to an individual worker. In order to find a matching, the platform can consider the edges $(i j) \in E$ in any order and make a one-time take-it-or-leave-it offer of a price $π_{ij} = w$ of its choosing to $i$ for completing $j$. The worker accepts the offer with a known probability $ p_{ijw} $; in this case the job and the worker are irrevocably matched. What is the best way to make offers to maximize revenue and/or social welfare? The optimal algorithm is known to be NP-hard to compute (even if there is only a single job). With this in mind, we design efficient approximations to the optimal policy via a new Random-Order Online Contention Resolution Scheme (RO-OCRS) for matching. Our main result is a 0.456-balanced RO-OCRS in bipartite graphs and a 0.45-balanced RO-OCRS in general graphs. These algorithms improve on the recent bound of $\frac{1}{2}(1-e^{-2})\approx 0.432$ of [BGMS21], and improve on the best known lower bounds for the correlation gap of matching, despite applying to a significantly more restrictive setting. As a consequence of our OCRS results, we obtain a $0.456$-approximate algorithm for the sequential pricing problem. We further extend our results to settings where workers can only be contacted a limited number of times, and show how to achieve improved results for this problem, via improved algorithms for the well-studied stochastic probing problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Locality of Random Digraphs on Expanders

We study random digraphs on sequences of expanders with bounded average degree {which converge locally in probability}. We prove that the threshold for the existence of a giant strongly connected component, as well as the asymptotic fraction of nodes with giant fan-in or nodes with giant fan-out are local, in the sense that they are the same for two sequences with the same local limit. The digraph has a bow-tie structure, with all but a vanishing fraction of nodes lying either in the unique strongly connected giant and its fan-in and fan-out, or in sets with small fan-in and small fan-out. All local quantities are expressed in terms of percolation on the limiting rooted graph, without any structural assumptions on the limit, allowing, in particular, for non tree-like graphs. {In the course of establishing these results, we generalize previous results on the locality of the size of the giant to expanders of bounded average degree with possibly non-tree like limits. We also show that regardless of the local convergence of a sequence, the uniqueness of the giant and convergence of its relative size for unoriented percolation imply the bow-tie structure for directed percolation.} An application of our methods shows that the critical threshold for bond percolation and random digraphs on preferential attachment graphs is $p_c=0$, with an infinite order phase transition at $p_c$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Sequential importance sampling for estimating expectations over the space of perfect matchings

This paper makes three contributions to estimating the number of perfect matching in bipartite graphs. First, we prove that the popular sequential importance sampling algorithm works in polynomial time for dense bipartite graphs. More carefully, our algorithm gives a $(1\pmε)$-approximation for the number of perfect matchings of a $λ$-dense bipartite graph, using $O(n^{\frac{1-2λ}λε^{-2}})$ samples. With size $n$ on each side and for $\frac{1}{2}>λ>0$, a $λ$-dense bipartite graph has all degrees greater than $(λ+\frac{1}{2})n$. Second, practical applications of the algorithm require many calls to matching algorithms. A novel preprocessing step is provided which makes significant improvements. Third, three applications are provided. The first is for counting Latin squares, the second is a practical way of computing the greedy algorithm for a card-guessing game with feedback, and the third is for stochastic block models. In all three examples, sequential importance sampling allows treating practical problems of reasonably large sizes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Tiered Random Matching Markets: Rank is Proportional to Popularity

We study the stable marriage problem in two-sided markets with randomly generated preferences. We consider agents on each side divided into a constant number of "soft tiers", which intuitively indicate the quality of the agent. Specifically, every agent within a tier has the same public score, and agents on each side have preferences independently generated proportionally to the public scores of the other side. We compute the expected average rank which agents in each tier have for their partners in the men-optimal stable matching, and prove concentration results for the average rank in asymptotically large markets. Furthermore, we show that despite having a significant effect on ranks, public scores do not strongly influence the probability of an agent matching to a given tier of the other side. This generalizes results of [Pittel 1989] which correspond to uniform preferences. The results quantitatively demonstrate the effect of competition due to the heterogeneous attractiveness of agents in the market, and we give the first explicit calculations of rank beyond uniform markets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access