Researcher profile

Amanda Burcroff

Amanda Burcroff contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Pattern-Avoiding Permutation Powers

Recently, Bóna and Smith defined strong pattern avoidance, saying that a permutation $π$ strongly avoids a pattern $τ$ if $π$ and $π^2$ both avoid $τ$. They conjectured that for every positive integer $k$, there is a permutation in $S_{k^3}$ that strongly avoids $123\cdots (k+1)$. We use the Robinson--Schensted--Knuth correspondence to settle this conjecture, showing that the number of such permutations is at least $k^{k^3/2+O(k^3/\log k)}$ and at most $k^{2k^3+O(k^3/\log k)}$. We enumerate $231$-avoiding permutations of order $3$, and we give two further enumerative results concerning strong pattern avoidance. We also consider permutations whose powers all avoid a pattern $τ$. Finally, we study subgroups of symmetric groups whose elements all avoid certain patterns. This leads to several new open problems connecting the group structures of symmetric groups with pattern avoidance.

preprint2020arXiv

Sets Arising as Minimal Additive Complements in the Integers

A subset $C$ of an abelian group $G$ is a minimal additive complement to $W \subseteq G$ if $C + W = G$ and if $C' + W \neq G$ for any proper subset $C' \subset C$. In this paper, we study which sets of integers arise as minimal additive complements. We confirm a conjecture of Kwon, showing that bounded-below sets with arbitrarily large gaps arise as minimal additive complements. Moreover, our construction shows that any such set belongs to a co-minimal pair, strengthening a result of Biswas and Saha for lacunary sequences. We bound the upper and lower Banach density of syndetic sets that arise as minimal additive complements to finite sets. We provide some necessary conditions for an eventually periodic set to arise as a minimal additive complement and demonstrate that these necessary conditions are also sufficient for certain classes of eventually periodic sets. We conclude with several conjectures and questions concerning the structure of minimal additive complements.

preprint2020arXiv

Tightness of Paired and Upper Domination Inequalities for Direct Product Graphs

A set $D$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is called dominating if every vertex of $G$ is either in $D$ or adjacent to a vertex of $D$. The paired domination number $γ_{\mathrm{pr}}(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum size of a dominating set whose induced subgraph admits a perfect matching, and the upper domination number $Γ(G)$ is the maximum size of a minimal dominating set. In this paper, we investigate the sharpness of two multiplicative inequalities for these domination parameters, where the graph product is the direct product $\times$. We show that for every positive constant $c$, there exist graphs $G$ and $H$ of arbitrarily large diameter such that $γ_{\mathrm{pr}}(G \times H) \leq cγ_{\mathrm{pr}}(G)γ_{\mathrm{pr}}(H)$, thus answering a question of Rall as well as two questions of Paulraja and Sampath Kumar. We then study when this inequality holds with $c = \frac{1}{2}$, in particular proving that it holds whenever $G$ and $H$ are trees. Finally, we demonstrate that the inequality $Γ(G \times H) \geq Γ(G) Γ(H)$, due to Brešar, Klavžar, and Rall, is tight.