BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Aline Parreau

Aline Parreau contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CODiscrete MathematicsComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

On the parameterized complexity of the Maker-Breaker domination game

Since its introduction as a Maker-Breaker positional game by Duchêne et al. in 2020, the Maker-Breaker domination game has become one of the most studied positional games on vertices. In this game, two players, Dominator and Staller, alternately claim an unclaimed vertex of a given graph G. If at some point the set of vertices claimed by Dominator is a dominating set, she wins; otherwise, i.e. if Staller manages to isolate a vertex by claiming all its closed neighborhood, Staller wins. Given a graph G and a first player, Dominator or Staller must have a winning strategy. We are interested in the computational complexity of determining which player has such a strategy. This problem is known to be PSPACE-complete on bipartite graphs of bounded degree and split graphs; polynomial on cographs, outerplanar graphs, and block graphs; and in NP for interval graphs. In this paper, we consider the parameterized complexity of this game. We start by considering as a parameter the number of moves of both players. We prove that for the general framework of Maker-Breaker positional games in hypergraphs, determining whether Breaker can claim a transversal of the hypergraph in k moves is W[2]-complete, in contrast to the problem of determining whether Maker can claim all the vertices of a hyperedge in k moves, which is known to be W[1]-complete since 2017. These two hardness results are then applied to the Maker-Breaker domination game, proving that it is W[2]-complete to decide if Dominator can dominate the graph in k moves and W[1]-complete to decide if Staller can isolate a vertex in k moves. Next, we provide FPT algorithms for the Maker-Breaker domination game parameterized by the neighborhood diversity, the modular width, the P4-fewness, the distance to cluster, and the feedback edge number.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Locating-dominating sets: from graphs to oriented graphs

A locating-dominating set in an undirected graph is a subset of vertices $S$ such that $S$ is dominating and for every $u,v \notin S$, we have $N(u)\cap S\ne N(v)\cap S$. In this paper, we consider the oriented version of the problem. A locating-dominating set in an oriented graph is a set $S$ such that for every $w\in V$, $N[w]^-\cap S=\emptyset$ and for each pair of vertices $u,v\in V\setminus S$, $N^-(u)\cap S\ne N^-(v)\cap S$. We consider the following two parameters. Given an undirected graph $G$, we look for $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)$ ($\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G))$ which is the size of the smallest (largest) optimal locating-dominating set over all orientations of $G$. In particular, if $D$ is an orientation of $G$, then $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)\leqγ_{LD}(D)\leq\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)$. For the best orientation, we prove that, for every twin-free graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)\le n/2$ proving a ``directed version'' of a conjecture on $γ_{LD}(G)$. Moreover, we give some bounds for $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)$ on many graph classes and drastically improve the value $n/2$ for (almost) $d$-regular graphs by showing that $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)\in O(\log d/d\cdot n)$ using a probabilistic argument. While $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)\leqγ_{LD}(G)$ holds for every graph $G$, we give some graph classes graphs for which $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)\geqγ_{LD}(G)$ and some for which $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)\leq γ_{LD}(G)$. We also give general bounds for $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)$. Finally, we show that for many graph classes $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)$ is polynomial on $n$ but we leave open the question whether there exist graphs with $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)\in O(\log n)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Metric dimension on sparse graphs and its applications to zero forcing sets

The metric dimension dim(G) of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a subset $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that each vertex of $G$ is uniquely determined by its distances to $S$. It is well-known that the metric dimension of a graph can be drastically increased by the modification of a single edge. Our main result consists in proving that the increase of the metric dimension of an edge addition can be amortized in the sense that if the graph consists of a spanning tree $T$ plus $c$ edges, then the metric dimension of $G$ is at most the metric dimension of $T$ plus $6c$. We then use this result to prove a weakening of a conjecture of Eroh et al. The zero forcing number $Z(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a subset $S$ of black vertices (whereas the other vertices are colored white) of $G$ such that all the vertices will turned black after applying finitely many times the following rule: a white vertex is turned black if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. Eroh et al. conjectured that, for any graph $G$, $dim(G)\leq Z(G) + c(G)$, where $c(G)$ is the number of edges that have to be removed from $G$ to get a forest. They proved the conjecture is true for trees and unicyclic graphs. We prove a weaker version of the conjecture: $dim(G)\leq Z(G)+6c(G)$ holds for any graph. We also prove that the conjecture is true for graphs with edge disjoint cycles, widely generalizing the unicyclic result of Eroh et al.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Partizan Subtraction Games

Partizan subtraction games are combinatorial games where two players, say Left and Right, alternately remove a number n of tokens from a heap of tokens, with $n \in S_L$ (resp. $n \in S_R$) when it is Left's (resp. Right's) turn. The first player unable to move loses. These games were introduced by Fraenkel and Kotzig in 1987, where they introduced the notion of dominance, i.e. an asymptotic behavior of the outcome sequence where Left always wins if the heap is sufficiently large. In the current paper, we investigate the other kinds of behaviors for the outcome sequence. In addition to dominance, three other disjoint behaviors are defined, namely weak dominance, fairness and ultimate impartiality. We consider the problem of computing this behavior with respect to $S_L$ and $S_R$, which is connected to the well-known Frobenius coin problem. General results are given, together with arithmetic and geometric characterizations when the sets $S_L$ and $S_R$ have size at most 2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

INFLUENCE: a partizan scoring game on graphs

We introduce the game INFLUENCE, a scoring combinatorial game, played on a directed graph where each vertex is either colored black or white. The two players, Black and White play alternately by taking a vertex of their color and all its successors (for Black) or all its predecessors (for White). The score of each player is the number of vertices he has taken. We prove that INFLUENCE is a nonzugzwang game, meaning that no player has interest to pass at any step of the game, and thus belongs to Milnor's universe. We study this game in the particular class of paths where black and white are alternated. We give an almost tight strategy for both players when there is one path. More precisely, we prove that the first player always gets a strictly better score than the second one, but that the difference between the score is bounded by 5. Finally, we exhibit some graphs for which the initial proportion of vertices of the color of a player is as small as possible but where this player can get almost all the vertices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access