Researcher profile

Alexander Hartmaier

Alexander Hartmaier contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Free energy function of dislocation densities by large scale atomistic simulation

This paper discusses the free energy of complex dislocation microstructures, which is a fundamental property of continuum plasticity. In the past, multiple models of the self energy of dislocations have been proposed in the literature that partially contradict each other. In order to gain insight into the relationship between dislocation microstructures and the free energy associated with them, instead of deriving a model based on theoretical or phenomenological arguments, here, these quantities are directly measured using large scale molecular dynamics simulations. Plasticity is induced using nanoindentation that creates an inhomogeneous distribution of dislocations as the result of dislocation nucleation and multiplication caused by the local deformation. Using this approach, the measurements of dislocation densities and free energies are ab-initio, because only the interatomic potential is defining the reaction of the system to the applied deformation. The simulation results support strongly a linear relation between the scalar dislocation density and the free energy, which can be related very well to the classical model of mechanical energy of straight dislocations, even for the complex dislocation networks considered here.

preprint2010arXiv

Ab-initio tensile tests of Al bulk crystals and grain boundaries: on the universality of mechanical behaviour

We have performed ab-initio tensile tests of bulk Al along different tensile axes, as well as perpendicular to different grain boundaries to determine mechanical properties such as interface energy, work of separation and theoretical strength. We show that all the different investigated geometries exhibit energy-displacement curves that can be brought into coincidence in the spirit of the well known universal binding energy relationship curve. This simplifies significantly the calculation of ab-initio tensile strengths for the whole parameter space of grain boundaries.

preprint2008arXiv

Pair vs many-body potentials: influence on elastic and plastic behavior in nanoindentation

Molecular-dynamics simulation can give atomistic information on the processes occurring in nanoindentation experiments. In particular, the nucleation of dislocation loops, their growth, interaction and motion can be studied. We investigate how realistic the interatomic potentials underlying the simulations have to be in order to describe these complex processes. Specifically we investigate nanoindentation into a Cu single crystal. We compare simulations based on a realistic many-body interaction potential of the embedded-atom-method type with two simple pair potentials, a Lennard-Jones and a Morse potential. We find that qualitatively many aspects of nanoindentation are fairly well reproduced by the simple pair potentials: elastic regime, critical stress and indentation depth for yielding, dependence on the crystal orientation, and even the level of the hardness. The quantitative deficits of the pair potential predictions can be traced back (i) to the fact that the pair potentials are unable in principle to model the elastic anisotropy of cubic crystals; (ii) as the major drawback of pair potentials we identify the gross underestimation of the stable stacking fault energy. As a consequence these potentials predict the formation of too large dislocation loops, the too rapid expansion of partials, too little cross slip and in consequence a severe overestimation of work hardening.