BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Alex Selby contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
Here is proposed a general subgraph-based method for efficiently sampling certain graphical models, typically using subgraphs of a fixed treewidth, and also a related method for finding minimum energy (ground) states. In the case of models with frustration, such as the spin glass, evidence is presented that this method can be more efficient than traditional single-site update methods.
Time-of-flight measurements such as the OPERA and MINOS experiments rely crucially on statistical analysis (as well as many other ingredients) for their conclusions. The nature of these experiments leads to a simple class of statistical models for the results; however, which model in the class is appropriate is not known exactly, as this depends on information obtained experimentally, which is subject to noise and other errors. To obtain robust conclusions, this problem, known as "model uncertainty," needs to be addressed, with quantitative bounds on the effect such uncertainty may have on the final result. The OPERA (and MINOS) analysis appears to take steps to mitigate the effects of model uncertainty, though without quantifying any remaining effect. We describe one of the strategies used (averaging individual probability distributions), and point out a potential source of error if this is not carried out correctly. We then argue that the correct version of this strategy is not the most effective, and suggest possible alternatives. These alternatives may give more accurate statistical results using the same data, allowing, for example, more accurate determination of the dependence of the anomalous time shift on energy. Which strategies work and how well can only be evaluated with access to the full data. Whether or not the anomalous result from OPERA turns out to be confirmed, we believe that techniques such as those presented here may be appropriate for the analysis of other timing experiments of this type.