Source author record

Alex Selby

Alex Selby appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Efficient subgraph-based sampling of Ising-type models with frustration

Here is proposed a general subgraph-based method for efficiently sampling certain graphical models, typically using subgraphs of a fixed treewidth, and also a related method for finding minimum energy (ground) states. In the case of models with frustration, such as the spin glass, evidence is presented that this method can be more efficient than traditional single-site update methods.

preprint2011arXiv

Statistical model uncertainty and OPERA-like time-of-flight measurements

Time-of-flight measurements such as the OPERA and MINOS experiments rely crucially on statistical analysis (as well as many other ingredients) for their conclusions. The nature of these experiments leads to a simple class of statistical models for the results; however, which model in the class is appropriate is not known exactly, as this depends on information obtained experimentally, which is subject to noise and other errors. To obtain robust conclusions, this problem, known as "model uncertainty," needs to be addressed, with quantitative bounds on the effect such uncertainty may have on the final result. The OPERA (and MINOS) analysis appears to take steps to mitigate the effects of model uncertainty, though without quantifying any remaining effect. We describe one of the strategies used (averaging individual probability distributions), and point out a potential source of error if this is not carried out correctly. We then argue that the correct version of this strategy is not the most effective, and suggest possible alternatives. These alternatives may give more accurate statistical results using the same data, allowing, for example, more accurate determination of the dependence of the anomalous time shift on energy. Which strategies work and how well can only be evaluated with access to the full data. Whether or not the anomalous result from OPERA turns out to be confirmed, we believe that techniques such as those presented here may be appropriate for the analysis of other timing experiments of this type.